From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753403Ab3FRCvi (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:51:38 -0400 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:58847 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430Ab3FRCvh (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:51:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:51:34 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Dave Hansen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jan kara Subject: Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking Message-ID: <20130618025133.GB24479@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Dave Hansen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jan kara References: <51B7B128.60909@intel.com> <20130614140940.GA20401@gmail.com> <20130614140215.GA1017@thunk.org> <20130614170028.GA21544@gmail.com> <20130614180054.GB1017@thunk.org> <20130617101033.GA17828@gmail.com> <51BF7BAA.5030803@intel.com> <20130618022548.GA24671@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130618022548.GA24671@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:25:48AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention that this patch bases against ext4/master > branch. Now ext4/dev branch has some regression when I run xfstests. What regressions are you seeing? > Ted, I notice that now in ext4 tree we have 'dev', 'dev-with-revert', > and 'dev2' branches. Which one is the best to generate a new patch for > the next merge window? Either the dev branch or the master branch. The dev-with-revert and dev2 were branches that I had created when investigating a potential regression with the invalidage page range patch set. I've since determined that it's a timing issue and it's not a new regression --- we've had xfstests failures with test generic/300 for a while now. - Ted