From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934307Ab3FSLLo (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:11:44 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:33176 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933991Ab3FSLLn (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:11:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:11:40 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uio 1/2] fix uio_pdrv_genirq with device tree but no interrupt Message-ID: <20130619111140.GA20356@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <20130618203453.GA18503@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130618224404.GA32230@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130618224404.GA32230@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2013-06-18 15:44:04, Greg KH wrote: > What's with the odd [uio] in the Subject? What happened to the > universal [PATCH 1/2] format? > > Ick, I'll fix this up this time, but come on, you know better... Sorry about that. It seems every maintainer has slightly different rules for that... I thought that stuff in [] is normally ignored, so I did not give it too much thought. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html