mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Reserve only one queue tag for sync IO if only 3 tags are available
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:46:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130628204631.GB15288@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628193152.GF24293@kernel.dk>

On Fri 28-06-13 21:31:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28 2013, Jan Kara wrote:
> > In case a device has three tags available we still reserve two of them
> > for sync IO. That leaves only a single tag for async IO such as
> > writeback from flusher thread which results in poor performance.
> > 
> > Allow async IO to consume two tags in case queue has three tag availabe
> > to get a decent async write performance.
> > 
> > This patch improves streaming write performance on a machine with such disk
> > from ~21 MB/s to ~52 MB/s. Also postmark throughput in presence of
> > streaming writer improves from 8 to 12 transactions per second so sync
> > IO doesn't seem to be harmed in presence of heavy async writer.
> 
> That's pretty crazy! Never seen a device like that. But yes, it
> obviously exists, and the 2 reserved tags doesn't work well for that. So
> it's an improvement.
  Yeah, I agree it's a weird hardware. It's a ppc64 machine where storage
identifies as:
scsi2 : IBM 573E Storage Adapter
scsi 2:0:4:0: Direct-Access     IBM      ST373453LC       C51C PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
scsi 2:0:5:0: Direct-Access     IBM   H0 ST373207LC       C70D PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
scsi 2:0:8:0: Direct-Access     IBM   H0 ST373207LC       C70D PQ: 0 ANSI: 4

  It took me a while to figure out why this machine observes performance
characteristics noone else sees.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-28 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-28 15:08 Jan Kara
2013-06-28 19:31 ` Jens Axboe
2013-06-28 20:46   ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130628204631.GB15288@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®