From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL] workqueue changes for v3.11-rc1
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 07:17:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130701141754.GD11408@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
Hello, Linus.
Surprisingly, Lai and I didn't break too many things implementing
custom pools and stuff last time around and there aren't any follow-up
changes necessary at this point.
The only change in this pull request is Viresh's patches to make some
per-cpu workqueues to behave as unbound workqueues dependent on a boot
param whose default can be configured via a config option. This leads
to higher processing overhead / lower bandwidth as more work items are
bounced across CPUs; however, it can lead to noticeable powersave in
certain configurations - ~10% w/ idlish constant workload on a
big.LITTLE configuration according to Viresh.
This is because per-cpu workqueues interfere with how the scheduler
perceives whether or not each CPU is idle by forcing pinned tasks on
them, which makes the scheduler's power-aware scheduling decisions
less effective.
Its effectiveness is likely less pronounced on homogenous
configurations and this type of optimization can probably be made
automatic; however, the changes are pretty minimal and the affected
workqueues are clearly marked, so it's an easy gain for some
configurations for the time being with pretty unintrusive changes.
The above changes are available in the following branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-3.11
for you to fetch changes up to a85f1a41f020bc2c97611060bcfae6f48a1db28d:
fbcon: queue work on power efficient wq (2013-05-14 10:50:07 -0700)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Viresh Kumar (5):
workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power oriented workqueues
workqueue: Add system wide power_efficient workqueues
PHYLIB: queue work on system_power_efficient_wq
block: queue work on power efficient wq
fbcon: queue work on power efficient wq
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++
block/blk-core.c | 3 ++-
block/blk-ioc.c | 3 ++-
block/genhd.c | 12 ++++++++----
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/video/console/fbcon.c | 2 +-
include/linux/workqueue.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/power/Kconfig | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/workqueue.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
9 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Thanks.
--
tejun
reply other threads:[~2013-07-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130701141754.GD11408@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®