From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: smart wake-affine
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 10:50:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703085025.GG23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D3C058.3020601@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> +static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + int factor = nr_cpus_node(cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id()));
That's still a cpumask_weight() in there... we should avoid that. How
about something like the below:
> +
> + /*
> + * Yeah, it's the switching-frequency, could means many wakee or
> + * rapidly switch, use factor here will just help to automatically
> + * adjust the loose-degree, so bigger node will lead to more pull.
> + */
> + if (p->nr_wakee_switch > factor) {
> + /*
> + * wakee is somewhat hot, it needs certain amount of cpu
> + * resource, so if waker is far more hot, prefer to leave
> + * it alone.
> + */
> + if (current->nr_wakee_switch > (factor * p->nr_wakee_switch))
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9b1f2e5..166ab9b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5081,18 +5083,23 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
* two cpus are in the same cache domain, see cpus_share_cache().
*/
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
int id = cpu;
+ int size = 1;
sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
- if (sd)
+ if (sd) {
id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
+ size = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
+ }
rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu), sd);
+ per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu) = size;
per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = id;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ef0a7b2..c992f58 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ static inline struct sched_domain *highest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
}
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_llc);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
struct sched_group_power {
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3175,7 +3175,7 @@ static inline unsigned long effective_lo
static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
{
- int factor = nr_cpus_node(cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id()));
+ int factor = this_cpu_read(sd_llc_size);
/*
* Yeah, it's the switching-frequency, could means many wakee or
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-28 5:05 [RFC PATCH] " Michael Wang
2013-06-03 2:28 ` Michael Wang
2013-06-03 3:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-03 3:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-06-03 3:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-03 4:52 ` Michael Wang
2013-06-03 5:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-03 5:50 ` Michael Wang
2013-06-03 6:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-03 6:31 ` Michael Wang
2013-06-13 3:09 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-02 4:43 ` [PATCH] " Michael Wang
2013-07-02 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 5:50 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-02 5:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 6:17 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-02 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 6:45 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-02 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 9:35 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-02 9:44 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-04 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 9:38 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-04 10:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-05 2:47 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-05 4:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-05 4:33 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-05 5:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-05 6:16 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-07 6:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-08 2:49 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-08 3:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-08 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-08 8:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-08 9:08 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-08 8:58 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-08 18:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-09 2:30 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-09 2:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-09 2:52 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-15 5:13 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-15 5:57 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-15 6:01 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-18 2:15 ` Michael Wang
2013-07-03 6:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-07-03 9:11 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130703085025.GG23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome