From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mce, acpi/apei: Soft-offline a page on firmware GHES notification
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:44:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130703144447.GB13951@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130702112424.6401.11586.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:02:48PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Here is the updated patch. I also added printk_ratelimit() in line with the
> rest of the GHES code.
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen
>
> --
> If the firmware indicates in GHES error data entry that the error threshold
> has exceeded for a corrected error event, then we try to soft-offline the
> page. This could be called in interrupt context, so we queue this up similar
> to how we handle memory failure scenarios.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index fcd7d91..74ef688 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,34 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes)
> ghes->flags &= ~GHES_TO_CLEAR;
> }
>
> +static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sev)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
> + int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
> + struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
> + mem_err = (struct cper_sec_mem_err *)(gdata+1);
A newline here please. Also, spaces around '+'.
> + if (sec_sev == GHES_SEV_CORRECTED &&
> + (gdata->flags & CPER_SEC_ERROR_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED) &&
> + (mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)) {
> + unsigned long pfn;
This pfn is defined twice, move it up to the beginning of the function.
> + pfn = mem_err->physical_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn))
> + memory_failure_queue(pfn, 0, MF_SOFT_OFFLINE);
> + else if (printk_ratelimit())
> + pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
WARNING: Prefer printk_ratelimited or pr_<level>_ratelimited to printk_ratelimit
#35: FILE: drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:425:
+ else if (printk_ratelimit())
Please run your patches through checkpatch.pl first.
This requested change will even simplify the code (ontop of your patch):
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 74ef6882bca9..87e11d468f6b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -422,10 +422,10 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
pfn = mem_err->physical_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (pfn_valid(pfn))
memory_failure_queue(pfn, 0, MF_SOFT_OFFLINE);
- else if (printk_ratelimit())
- pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
- "Invalid address in generic error data: %#llx\n",
- mem_err->physical_addr);
+ else
+ pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
+ "Invalid address in generic error data: %#llx\n",
+ mem_err->physical_addr);
}
if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
---
> + "Invalid address in generic error data: %#llx\n",
> + mem_err->physical_addr);
> + }
> + if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> + sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> + mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS) {
> + unsigned long pfn;
> + pfn = mem_err->physical_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + memory_failure_queue(pfn, 0, 0);
> + }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> {
> @@ -428,15 +456,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> apei_mce_report_mem_error(sev == GHES_SEV_CORRECTED,
> mem_err);
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
> - if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> - sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> - mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS) {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> - pfn = mem_err->physical_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - memory_failure_queue(pfn, 0, 0);
> - }
> -#endif
> + ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev);
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index e0c8528..958e9efd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1784,6 +1784,7 @@ enum mf_flags {
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1 << 0,
> MF_ACTION_REQUIRED = 1 << 1,
> MF_MUST_KILL = 1 << 2,
> + MF_SOFT_OFFLINE = 1 << 3,
> };
> extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags);
> extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags);
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index ceb0c7f..0d6717e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,10 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> if (!gotten)
> break;
> - memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.trapno, entry.flags);
> + if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> + soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn), entry.flags);
> + else
> + memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.trapno, entry.flags);
The rest looks ok to me.
I'm guessing this has been tested by injecting errors...?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-01 15:38 [PATCH v3 0/3] Firmware first mode for corrected errors Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-01 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-01 22:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-01 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mce: acpi/apei: Add a boot option to disable ff mode for corrected errors Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-01 22:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-01 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mce, acpi/apei: Soft-offline a page on firmware GHES notification Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-01 23:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-02 11:05 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-02 11:32 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-03 14:44 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-07-03 15:40 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-08 19:00 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-10 9:27 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-10 9:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10 20:05 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-01 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Firmware first mode for corrected errors Borislav Petkov
2013-07-02 12:54 ` [PATCH 4] mce: acpi/apei: Add a sysctl to control page offlining on firmware report Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-03 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-03 15:46 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-08 20:26 ` Luck, Tony
2013-07-10 9:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130703144447.GB13951@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®