Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] USB: PHY: Make PHY driver selection possible by controller drivers

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3171 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:01:14PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 07/09/2013 02:29 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:51:41PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Convert PHY Drivers from menuconfig to menu so that the PHY drivers
> >> can be explicitely selected by the controller drivers.
> >>
> >> USB_PHY is no longer a user visible option. It is upto to the PHY
> >> drivers to select it if needed. This patch does so for the existing
> >> PHY drivers that use the USB_PHY library.
> >>
> >> Doing so moves the USB_PHY and PHY driver selection problem from the
> >> end user to the PHY and controller driver developer.
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >>
> >> Earlier, a controller driver (e.g. EHCI_OMAP) that needs to select
> >> a PHY driver (e.g. NOP_PHY) couldn't do so because the PHY driver
> >> depended on USB_PHY. Making the controller driver depend on USB_PHY
> >> has a negative effect i.e. it becomes invisible to the user till
> >> USB_PHY is enabled. Most end users will not familiar with this.
> >>
> >> With this patch, the end user just needs to select the controller driver
> >> needed for his/her platform without worrying about which PHY driver to
> >> select.
> >>
> >> Also update USB_EHCI_MSM, USB_LPC32XX and USB_OMAP to not depend
> >> on USB_PHY any more. They can safely select the necessary PHY drivers.
> >>
> >> CC: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
> >> CC: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> >> [USB_LPC32XX part] Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> > 
> > There is one problem (?) with this: phy-core.ko will never be a module.
> > If that's not a problem for anyone, I guess this is safe to apply. I'll
> > wait a little longer until merge window closes to give people some extra
> > time to shout.
> > 
> 
> Is phy-core already meant to be loaded as a module already?
> 
> At least with the old phy.c I was getting the following build errors if it was built as
> a module
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `usbhs_init_phys':
> /work/linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c:652: undefined reference to `usb_bind_phy'
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_2430sdp_init':
> /work/linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c:236: undefined reference to `usb_bind_phy'
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap3_beagle_init':
> /work/linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c:554: undefined reference to `usb_bind_phy'
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `devkit8000_init':
> /work/linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c:596: undefined reference to `usb_bind_phy'
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_ldp_init':
> /work/linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ldp.c:379: undefined reference to `usb_bind_phy'
> 
> If we are sure it can be built as a module then we could just change "config USB_PHY" to tristate
> instead of bool.

good point, board-files are using some of our symbols. Then we can apply
your patches. I'll wait a bit longer, though.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]