From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"open list:INTEL IOMMU (VT-d)" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at drivers/iommu/dmar.c:484 warn_invalid_dmar with Intel Motherboard
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:55:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710035523.GB13149@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373417595.26127.27.camel@dwoodhou-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:53:15AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 17:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > I meant warning as in pr_warn or dev_warn, not WARNING as in traceback.
> > Keep in mind that a casual user doesn't expect to see a traceback and will tend
> > to get alarmed. Several bugs have been filed against this "issue" in various
> > distributions, which is not surprising given the alarmist message.
> > What is the point of that ?
>
> It is warning you that your hardware is broken. Take it back to the
> place from which you purchased it, and ask for your money back if it
> isn't fixed.
>
> (Slightly) more seriously, this level of warning *does* get things
> fixed, and when kerneloops was running it made it very easy to track
> this kind of issue and apply pressure where it was needed to improve
> quality.
>
> Any user who has taken the trouble to file bugs has *also* taken it up
> with their firmware vendor, I hope?
>
No idea ... but have you ever tried that as a private entity ?
If there is a secret list of people to contact at vendor X to get things
like this one fixed, please let me know ;).
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 20:24 Guenter Roeck
2013-07-09 21:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-09 22:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-09 23:22 ` Chris Wright
2013-07-09 23:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-10 0:05 ` Chris Wright
2013-07-10 0:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-10 0:53 ` David Woodhouse
2013-07-10 3:55 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-07-11 19:00 ` Chris Wright
2013-07-11 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-11 22:31 ` Chris Wright
2013-08-14 9:36 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130710035523.GB13149@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®