From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@gmail.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Seg fault occurs when running statically compiled binary from kernel using call_usermodehelper
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:52:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710185200.GX24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130710163410.GA30514@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:34:11PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Ok, I've finally got to the bottom of this, but I'm not sure on the best way
> to fix it.
I don't think you have! You need to look back at the older ARM kernels
to really get to the bottom of this...
> The issue is that libc expects r0 to contain a function pointer
> to be invoked at exit (rtld_fini), to clean up after a dynamic linker. If
> this pointer is NULL, then it is ignored. We actually zero this pointer in
> our ELF_PLAT_INIT macro.
>
> At the same time, we have this strange code called next from the ARM ELF
> loader:
>
> regs->ARM_r2 = stack[2]; /* r2 (envp) */ \
> regs->ARM_r1 = stack[1]; /* r1 (argv) */ \
> regs->ARM_r0 = stack[0]; /* r0 (argc) */ \
>
> which puts argc into r0.
You're sort of right. It dates from the days when we had a.out binaries,
those required argc, argv and envp in r0/r1/r2 - and ARM kernels carried
this hack in binfmt_aout.c to make it work in conjunction with the above:
static int load_aout_binary(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
{
...
start_thread(regs, ex.a_entry, current->mm->start_stack);
#ifndef __arm__
return 0;
#else
return regs->ARM_r0;
#endif
}
ELF, on the other hand, never had that hack - ELF has always been zero
in r0, and it's always retrieved the argc/argv/envp off the stack.
As the above hack got dropped from the kernel (I don't think it ever made
it into mainline), I think we should be safe getting rid of this
initialization of regs->ARM_r0 to r2, leaving them all as zeros.
We should probably also remove the selection of HAVE_AOUT from
arch/arm/Kconfig too as this definitely won't work with any recent
kernel (certainly not without binfmt_aout.c hacked in the above way.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 1:45 Ashish Sangwan
2013-07-08 1:46 ` Ashish Sangwan
2013-07-10 10:42 ` Ashish Sangwan
2013-07-10 16:34 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-10 18:09 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-10 18:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-07-11 10:54 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130710185200.GX24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=a.sangwan@samsung.com \
--cc=ashishsangwan2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®