From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@freescale.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, lars@metafoo.de, robin.getz@analog.com,
Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, lars-peter.clausen@analog.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pankaj.chauhan@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Radio device framework
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:22:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130711042210.GA23660@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DE2DB5.60608@freescale.com>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:29:49AM +0530, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> On 7/8/2013 3:19 PM, akhil.goyal@freescale.com wrote:
> >From: Akhil Goyal<akhil.goyal@freescale.com>
> >
> >RF signal path is integral part of any system that transmits/receives RF
> >(radio frequency) signals. In these systems Data is processed/converted
> >to IQ samples (digital representation a RF signal) and passed to a RFIC
> >(RF PHY) which converts the digital RF signal (IQ samples) to analog and
> >transmits over antenna.
> >
> >Typically The signal path consists of multiple components:
> >
> >Antenna controller<-> vector signal processors<-> RFIC<-> Antenna
> >
> >Each of these components have specific functionalities:
> >
> >1. Antenna controller: Framing of digital IQ data into protocol specific frames.
> >2. vector signal processors: For conditioning of signal.
> >3. RFIC : converts digital IQ data to analog signal which is transmitted/received on/from Air.
> >
> >Also it is desirable to control the complete signal path, for example:
> >bringing the complete signal path up/down etc.
> >
> >The radio device framework introduces a way to accommodate the RF signal
> >paths. One signal path is represented as a RF device (rf0, rf1 etc), and
> >it can contain multiple components which have their individual vendor
> >specific drivers. The framework provides mechanism by which individual
> >components can register with RF framework, and the framework will handle the binding
> >of individual component devices to a RF device. RF device exports the control
> >interfaces to user space, and this user space interface is independent of
> >component (vendor specific) drivers.
> >
> >This patch set include
> >1. RF Interface: Independent of phy or antenna controller.
> >2. AIC driver: Antenna interface Controller(AIC) of Hetrogenous SOC's
> >like BSC9131, BSC9132
> >4. Device tree bindings for AIC.
> >5. Device tree changes for BSC9131-AIC
> >
> >changes in v2:
> >1. incorporated comments for handling pointers in user space API structures.
> >2. Removed patches for AD9361 phy driver. It shall be sent once a proper
> >driver is in place for AD9361 chip
> >3. Removed Device tree nodes/bindings for AD9361
> >4. Incorporated comments for proper handling of wait_events
> >5. Added Documentation for IOCTL APIs and the structures used.
> >6. Inserted paddings in user space structures.
> >7. Reorganized code for rfdev.c to remove forward declaration and broke the
> >rf_ioctl() function to handle local structures correctly.
> >8. Corrected the error handling for mutex used.
> >
>
> Hi Arnd/Greg,
>
> It has been 3-4 days for this patch set and there are no review
> comments on these patches. Please suggest a way forward for the
> patch set. I have incorporated all the review comments for v1.
We are thick in the middle of the merge window for 3.11-rc1 and have
_no_ time for reviewing anything new, please give us a chance to catch
up with our existing work before asking about new stuff that is not
going to happen until 3.12 at the earliest.
In sort, patience please.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 9:49 akhil.goyal
2013-07-08 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers/misc: Support for RF interface " akhil.goyal
2013-07-08 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drivers/misc/rf: AIC: Freescale Antenna Interface controller driver akhil.goyal
2013-07-08 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] binding: Add device tree bindings for freescale AIC akhil.goyal
2013-07-08 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] BSC9131rdb/dts: Add nodes for supporting AIC akhil.goyal
2013-07-11 3:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Radio device framework Akhil Goyal
2013-07-11 4:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-08-05 11:18 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130711042210.GA23660@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lars-peter.clausen@analog.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.chauhan@freescale.com \
--cc=robin.getz@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome