From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jed Davis <jld@mozilla.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sf.net" <oprofile-list@lists.sf.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:54:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715135420.GG10000@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373685501-1620-1-git-send-email-jld@mozilla.com>
Hi Jed,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:18:20AM +0100, Jed Davis wrote:
> There is currently some inconsistency about the "frame pointer" on ARM.
> r11 is the register with assemblers recognize and disassemblers often
> print as "fp", and which is sufficient for stack unwinding when using
> the APCS frame pointer option; but when unwinding with the Exception
> Handling ABI, the register GCC uses when a constant offset won't suffice
> (or when -fno-omit-frame-pointer is used; see kernel/sched/Makefile in
> particular) is r11 on ARM and r7 on Thumb.
>
> Correspondingly, arch/arm/include/uapi/arm/ptrace.h defines ARM_fp to
> refer to r11, but arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c uses "FP" to mean either r11
> or r7 depending on Thumbness, and it is unclear what other cases such as
> the "fp" in struct stackframe should be doing.
>
> Effects of this are probably limited to failure of EHABI unwinding when
> starting from a function that uses r7 to restore its stack pointer, but
> the possibility for further breakage (which would be invisible on
> non-Thumb kernels) is worrying.
>
> With this change, it is hoped, r7 is consistently referred to as "r7",
> and "fp" always means r11; this costs a few extra ifdefs, but it should
> help prevent future issues.
I'm struggling to understand exactly the problem that this patch is trying
to address. If it's just a code consistency issue, I don't think it's worth
it (I actually find it less confusing the way we currently have things) but
if there is a real bug, perhaps you could provide a testcase?
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-13 3:18 Jed Davis
2013-07-15 13:54 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-07-20 4:46 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-21 21:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-22 13:56 ` Robert Richter
2013-07-22 18:52 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-29 21:21 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-30 9:25 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 9:38 ` [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y [OT] Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 9:44 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 10:09 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 11:46 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 17:50 ` Christopher Covington
2013-07-30 9:49 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-31 9:03 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-31 10:38 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-06 9:54 ` walimis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130715135420.GG10000@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=jld@mozilla.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®