From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753565Ab3GQKhN (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:37:13 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:33277 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753078Ab3GQKhL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:37:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:36:51 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Ashish Chavan Cc: lrg , alsa-devel , David Dajun Chen , linux-kernel , "kiran.padwal" Message-ID: <20130717103651.GP22506@sirena.org.uk> References: <1373024862.3233.63.camel@matrix> <20130705114456.GV27646@sirena.org.uk> <1373031306.3233.131.camel@matrix> <20130705133752.GX27646@sirena.org.uk> <1373270091.11222.12.camel@matrix> <20130708112613.GQ27646@sirena.org.uk> <1373542576.9286.101.camel@matrix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N709L9vpgywc1qLv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1373542576.9286.101.camel@matrix> X-Cookie: Many pages make a thick book. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: da9055: Update driver name to fix breakage due to pmic driver with same name X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --N709L9vpgywc1qLv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:06:16PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote: > accommodate this level of change. Is it possible that in first go we > just fix the breakage due to name collision so that both drivers remain > usable. And in second iteration, we restructure both of them as you > suggested? To be honest I'm really not terribly happy about this - I don't have all that much confidence that the second step will happen, the fact that this has been broken for a considerable time isn't inspiring here. However I guess... --N709L9vpgywc1qLv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR5nPAAAoJELSic+t+oim90+EP/1ARV4T5aPfB98kWihLAKs4s OYVCuerUjkXFtmhps/tYsKggB3BL2XdIue8/a/6lYIFBHwziRy2rEXlXN8Xb0Isz V9J+pzxt0kisFD58tkmdp3mXDeLxp4clBdXKg+YEquyxGmItoJyPSujXL0CjCnCh 1Dp1QulmEpxNUyBX5Zce8a7hp49XJNg75wSQ/rVnebg2wW01h6TfddfiZI+TZeus azlS7o58wixSRWcBE6EDCDFtN9n6CsiWx/70AtBLc4Kj1CRufoa5sxjZkwbCqTHo zbvl9tX/qCTm8N2PXzIB4VIR7ETVsTJogQUNptAUJvtD3ySH35YbLKSYJUHdSY4x hboKhO388o6I/kCVtw2OVFONGkS3iJffECZkVBg/TabFrmb3QHaNtHCdDBlZx3ee LZ+3ScF6Clb8UshBx1E6f9Piii7425QTer/7DLQSZfJvpabTKipGyYQgfF0Y0opX V/mGlxP3p3J0o01hdPFocLMfi4nHMX3BmXLtKEBGlwY73U3j/GYaadinMn3CrqIV Vi/odibXNDaYBxE5jsej/qSqqcrp0wB9q9cwtoe7oCW9onaVv34dsw5+ZPAqf8E0 pAugVEyjmLX4NMBQX067XWGNW2yW2QR0XJtQvSbXyBkDXEajApL6rsStm+jm22lq cJUxvPVr7jKM6ERlFO4t =wUT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N709L9vpgywc1qLv--