mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: keyrings@linux-nfs.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] KEYS: Skip key state checks when checking for possession
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:43:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130717204322.8591.11939.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130717204314.8591.52892.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Skip key state checks (invalidation, revocation and expiration) when checking
for possession.  Without this, keys that have been marked invalid, revoked
keys and expired keys are not given a possession attribute - which means the
possessor is not granted any possession permits and cannot do anything with
them unless they also have one a user, group or other permit.

This causes failures in the keyutils test suite's revocation and expiration
tests now that commit 96b5c8fea6c0861621051290d705ec2e971963f1 reduced the
initial permissions granted to a key.

The failures are due to accesses to revoked and expired keys being given
EACCES instead of EKEYREVOKED or EKEYEXPIRED.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 security/keys/internal.h         |    1 +
 security/keys/process_keys.c     |    8 +++++---
 security/keys/request_key.c      |    6 ++++--
 security/keys/request_key_auth.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/keys/internal.h b/security/keys/internal.h
index d4f1468..df971fe 100644
--- a/security/keys/internal.h
+++ b/security/keys/internal.h
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ extern key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct key_type *type,
 extern key_ref_t search_process_keyrings(struct key_type *type,
 					 const void *description,
 					 key_match_func_t match,
+					 bool no_state_check,
 					 const struct cred *cred);
 
 extern struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool skip_perm_check);
diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 42defae..a3410d6 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ found:
 key_ref_t search_process_keyrings(struct key_type *type,
 				  const void *description,
 				  key_match_func_t match,
+				  bool no_state_check,
 				  const struct cred *cred)
 {
 	struct request_key_auth *rka;
@@ -448,7 +449,7 @@ key_ref_t search_process_keyrings(struct key_type *type,
 	might_sleep();
 
 	key_ref = search_my_process_keyrings(type, description, match,
-					     false, cred);
+					     no_state_check, cred);
 	if (!IS_ERR(key_ref))
 		goto found;
 	err = key_ref;
@@ -468,7 +469,8 @@ key_ref_t search_process_keyrings(struct key_type *type,
 			rka = cred->request_key_auth->payload.data;
 
 			key_ref = search_process_keyrings(type, description,
-							  match, rka->cred);
+							  match, no_state_check,
+							  rka->cred);
 
 			up_read(&cred->request_key_auth->sem);
 
@@ -675,7 +677,7 @@ try_again:
 		/* check to see if we possess the key */
 		skey_ref = search_process_keyrings(key->type, key,
 						   lookup_user_key_possessed,
-						   cred);
+						   true, cred);
 
 		if (!IS_ERR(skey_ref)) {
 			key_put(key);
diff --git a/security/keys/request_key.c b/security/keys/request_key.c
index c411f9b..172115b 100644
--- a/security/keys/request_key.c
+++ b/security/keys/request_key.c
@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static int construct_alloc_key(struct key_type *type,
 	 * waited for locks */
 	mutex_lock(&key_construction_mutex);
 
-	key_ref = search_process_keyrings(type, description, type->match, cred);
+	key_ref = search_process_keyrings(type, description, type->match,
+					  false, cred);
 	if (!IS_ERR(key_ref))
 		goto key_already_present;
 
@@ -539,7 +540,8 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,
 	       dest_keyring, flags);
 
 	/* search all the process keyrings for a key */
-	key_ref = search_process_keyrings(type, description, type->match, cred);
+	key_ref = search_process_keyrings(type, description, type->match,
+					  false, cred);
 
 	if (!IS_ERR(key_ref)) {
 		key = key_ref_to_ptr(key_ref);
diff --git a/security/keys/request_key_auth.c b/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
index 85730d5..92077de 100644
--- a/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
+++ b/security/keys/request_key_auth.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)
 		&key_type_request_key_auth,
 		(void *) (unsigned long) target_id,
 		key_get_instantiation_authkey_match,
-		cred);
+		false, cred);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(authkey_ref)) {
 		authkey = ERR_CAST(authkey_ref);


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-17 20:43 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Associative array & Massive expansion of keyring capacity David Howells
2013-07-17 20:43 ` David Howells [this message]
2013-07-17 20:43 ` [PATCH 02/10] Add a generic associative array implementation David Howells
2013-07-17 20:53   ` Joe Perches
2013-07-17 21:01   ` David Howells
2013-07-18 13:18   ` [PATCH] Assoc_array: Drop leaf-type concept David Howells
2013-07-18 21:31     ` George Spelvin
2013-07-19 14:37       ` David Howells
2013-07-17 20:43 ` [PATCH 03/10] KEYS: Use bool in make_key_ref() and is_key_possessed() David Howells
2013-07-17 20:43 ` [PATCH 04/10] KEYS: key_is_dead() should take a const key pointer argument David Howells
2013-07-17 20:43 ` [PATCH 05/10] KEYS: Consolidate the concept of an 'index key' for key access David Howells
2013-07-17 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] KEYS: Introduce a search context structure David Howells
2013-07-17 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] KEYS: Search for auth-key by name rather than targt key ID David Howells
2013-07-17 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] KEYS: Define a __key_get() wrapper to use rather than atomic_inc() David Howells
2013-07-17 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] KEYS: Drop the permissions argument from __keyring_search_one() David Howells
2013-07-17 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] KEYS: Expand the capacity of a keyring David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130717204322.8591.11939.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®