From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: paolo.valente@unimore.it
Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fchecconi@gmail.com,
rizzo@iet.unipi.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] pkt_sched: sch_qfq: remove a source of high packet delay/jitter
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:03:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130718.130335.991768032324737210.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373957550-10134-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@unimore.it>
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:52:30 +0200
...
> This patch addresses this issue by just using the above
> 'instantaneous' value of the weight sum, instead of the maximum
> possible value, when updating the system virtual time. After the
> instantaneous weight sum is decreased, QFQ+ may deviate from the ideal
> service for a time interval in the order of the time to serve one
> maximum-size packet for each backlogged class. The worst-case extent
> of the deviation exhibited by QFQ+ during this time interval [1] is
> basically the same as of the deviation described above (but, without
> this patch, QFQ+ suffers from such a deviation all the time). Finally,
> this patch modifies the comment to the function qfq_slot_insert, to
> make it coherent with the fact that the weight sum used by QFQ+ can
> now be lower than the maximum possible value.
>
> [1] P. Valente, "Extending WF2Q+ to support a dynamic traffic mix",
> Proceedings of AAA-IDEA'05, June 2005.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Thank you for this amazing commit message.
Since you explained everything, even if I don't understand all of the
details of QFQ/QFQ+ I can in fact be confident in your change.
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-18 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 18:01 Paolo Valente
2013-07-15 18:12 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-16 6:46 ` Paolo Valente
2013-07-16 6:52 ` Paolo Valente
2013-07-18 20:03 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130718.130335.991768032324737210.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®