mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: paolo.valente@unimore.it
Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	rizzo@iet.unipi.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] pkt_sched: sch_qfq: remove a source of high packet delay/jitter
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:03:35 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130718.130335.991768032324737210.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373957550-10134-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@unimore.it>

From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:52:30 +0200

 ...
> This patch addresses this issue by just using the above
> 'instantaneous' value of the weight sum, instead of the maximum
> possible value, when updating the system virtual time.  After the
> instantaneous weight sum is decreased, QFQ+ may deviate from the ideal
> service for a time interval in the order of the time to serve one
> maximum-size packet for each backlogged class. The worst-case extent
> of the deviation exhibited by QFQ+ during this time interval [1] is
> basically the same as of the deviation described above (but, without
> this patch, QFQ+ suffers from such a deviation all the time). Finally,
> this patch modifies the comment to the function qfq_slot_insert, to
> make it coherent with the fact that the weight sum used by QFQ+ can
> now be lower than the maximum possible value.
> 
> [1] P. Valente, "Extending WF2Q+ to support a dynamic traffic mix",
> Proceedings of AAA-IDEA'05, June 2005.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>

Thank you for this amazing commit message.

Since you explained everything, even if I don't understand all of the
details of QFQ/QFQ+ I can in fact be confident in your change.

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-15 18:01 Paolo Valente
2013-07-15 18:12 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-16  6:46   ` Paolo Valente
2013-07-16  6:52   ` Paolo Valente
2013-07-18 20:03     ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130718.130335.991768032324737210.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®