From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754745Ab3GYHlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:41:51 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33461 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418Ab3GYHlr (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:41:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:41:46 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Tejun Heo , Li Zefan Cc: Andrew Morton , Glauber Costa , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner , LKML , Cgroups , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] memcg, cgroup: kill css_id Message-ID: <20130725074146.GC12818@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <51EFA554.6080801@huawei.com> <20130724143214.GL2540@dhcp22.suse.cz> <51F07863.2070705@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51F07863.2070705@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 25-07-13 08:59:15, Li Zefan wrote: > On 2013/7/24 22:32, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 24-07-13 17:58:44, Li Zefan wrote: > >> This patchset converts memcg to use cgroup->id, and then we can remove > >> cgroup css_id. > >> > >> As we've removed memcg's own refcnt, converting memcg to use cgroup->id > >> is very straight-forward. > >> > >> The patchset is based on Tejun's cgroup tree. > > > > Does it depend on any particular patches? I am asking because I would > > need to cherry pick those and apply them into my -mm git tree before > > these. > > > > Nope, but you should see a few but small conflicts if you apply them to > your git tree. Ohh, then there is no problem at all and Tejun, doesn't have to prepare any special branch. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs