From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ARM ATTEND] arch/arm SoC organization
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:18:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130731141841.GP5882@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
All,
I'd like to take the opportunity to discuss the layout/config of the arm
SoCs. By the time the KS rolls around, we should have at least two or more
use-cases to present and discuss (mvebu, bcm).
Between devicetree and multiplatform the concept of board-specific code
is really disappearing in arm-land. eg mach-kirkwood/ is almost fully
converted, within the next window or two, we'll be moving all of the DT
capable boards from kirkwood, orion5x, and dove over to mvebu.
mach-mvebu will then hold 5 different SoCs (it already has Armada 370
and Armada XP).
mach-bcm is in a similar situation (multi-SoC). I'm sure there are
others (nvidia, ti, etc).
So, I'd like to propose we discuss some lessons learned and maybe arrive
at some best practices. eg, should we just go with mach-$COMPANY/? How
best to handle config symbols for efficient building? Deprecation path
for legacy (unconverted) boards?
Also, to head off the demons, I am *not* proposing reorganizing
everything. Merely to find some consensus and good ideas so that as
things merge together, we are mostly on the same page.
I'm sure we all have different ideas and I think it'd be good to hear
what everyone else is thinking.
thx,
Jason.
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 14:18 Jason Cooper [this message]
2013-08-02 8:33 ` [Ksummit-2013-discuss] " Tony Lindgren
2013-08-02 23:06 ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-03 5:24 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-06 22:57 ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-05 6:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-06 23:07 ` Christian Daudt
2013-08-07 6:57 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130731141841.GP5882@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®