From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, davej@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, glommer@parallels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] writeback: periodically trim the writeback list
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:15:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130731151542.GI22930@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375244150-27296-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed 31-07-13 14:15:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Inodes are removed lazily from the bdi writeback list, so in the
> absence of sync(2) work inodes will build up on the bdi writback
> list even though they are no longer under IO. Use the periodic
> kupdate work check to remove inodes no longer under IO from the
> writeback list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 638f122..7c9bbf0 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -962,6 +962,23 @@ static long wb_check_background_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * clean out writeback list for all inodes that don't have IO in progress
> + */
> +static void wb_trim_writeback_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode;
> + struct inode *tmp;
> +
> + spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, &wb->b_writeback, i_wb_list) {
> + if (!mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))
> + list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> + }
Oo, and here you manipulate i_wb_list without mapping->tree_lock so that
can race with the list_empty() check in bdi_mark_inode_writeback().
Honza
> + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> +
> +}
> +
> static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> {
> unsigned long expired;
> @@ -978,6 +995,8 @@ static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> if (time_before(jiffies, expired))
> return 0;
>
> + wb_trim_writeback_list(wb);
> +
> wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
> nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
>
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 4:15 [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: plug writeback at a high level Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:40 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 5:48 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 8:34 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] inode: add IOP_NOTHASHED to avoid inode hash lock in evict Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:44 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02 1:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-02 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] sync: serialise per-superblock sync operations Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:12 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] inode: rename i_wb_list to i_io_list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 14:51 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] bdi: add a new writeback list for sync Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:11 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 5:59 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: periodically trim the writeback list Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 15:15 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-08-01 6:16 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 9:03 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] inode: convert per-sb inode list to a list_lru Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-02 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: Use RCU lookups for inode cache Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] list_lru: don't need node lock in list_lru_count_node Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 4:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] list_lru: don't lock during add/del if unnecessary Dave Chinner
2013-07-31 6:48 ` [PATCH 00/11] Sync and VFS scalability improvements Sedat Dilek
2013-08-01 6:19 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 6:31 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130731151542.GI22930@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome