From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756939Ab3HASrJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:47:09 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:43749 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754478Ab3HASrI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:47:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:47:03 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Richard Fitzgerald Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20130801184703.GZ9858@sirena.org.uk> References: <20130731131627.GA32631@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130731132522.GP9858@sirena.org.uk> <20130801151336.GA1112@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130801152356.GW9858@sirena.org.uk> <20130801155056.GA3996@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Z8BTbqcYO9MpMRm3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130801155056.GA3996@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Cookie: You will be awarded some great honor. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: init delayed_work for codec-codec links X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Z8BTbqcYO9MpMRm3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > Yeah, I think the problem is more one of bad naming. I should define that > function as the delayed work for codec-2-codec links, it just happens > that we don't currently have to do anything for them. The only thing > the pcm close_delayed_work() does is to send a SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_STOP > but for c2c links we never send a start anyway. That makes sense, yes. --Z8BTbqcYO9MpMRm3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR+q0kAAoJELSic+t+oim9qa4P/jZktsjkX9y7DrQmGcfk1yWy dKOsbKB18dPRxz5izXd90e2lQ3/6Vwj7X66WQj09Z0CNAbHwkK/r1D/xQB9Rf6XI ivx0+IVtXyX0rLvxgzskZlT7zaURchpE/yhxXE6vultYM1QQGwl/dwWykV1XnSlW mi2UHauj6JkorFrrfSkYb8ofRxFssXpkyxPHnCOnd6uXdI0bWc43622KGE8sNQCo 6nfthhkmFRSIZPYPCLBTxu9BDc1wJYjaekW0sUJym16OlZOGzKe9k3I7fQU4buv1 HQyxdDM8pHMUUI9P/4IN+BxY7W3Ci1sC9aWhk/tX90EEZH+2t68UZNosmxrLKdeV 3Bho/ZML4h8P4QpwpqyV2x8Du2q0poOEoMGiJsf8WWycnVsdeGZgBuwEcqtXWMXr 0aAm3BAfTP45115Bw/7VsxrQCoU3VknJY8otLHnwQsAPiynhr0sXIUeA+PBNYykc RCltkqf4cZbp7XebtUcWdXm4DQSjQOKpkC3+BQtimrF9d/sSLcO0/S9Ufkid+Rsd TSBCf8YSo4cjAzzoOICCuLxyuoOjo8twb1xVBrhB9KyZ4YJz57XFPfVjKgUmnq5W vJnWQGOvmWi2qMM+xIwMJ4PF/HhzgAaP5P6E2FnGRFS+N6S9LQVcIs70kOB3awl9 wzkhUTGXURi+LxFwY5zv =KzRg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Z8BTbqcYO9MpMRm3--