From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
"linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] watchdog: Add MOXA ART watchdog driver
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130802114159.GK2884@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375101228-10930-1-git-send-email-jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:33:48PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> Add watchdog driver for MOXA ART SoCs.
>
It would be nice to have a fuller description here.
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes since v6:
>
> 1. use local struct device *dev pointer, replace "&pdev->dev" with "dev"
>
> Applies to next-20130729
>
> .../bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt | 15 ++
> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1169857
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/moxa,moxart-watchdog.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +MOXA ART Watchdog timer
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : Must be "moxa,moxart-watchdog"
> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
> +- clocks : Should contain phandle for the clock that drives the counter
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + watchdog: watchdog@98500000 {
> + compatible = "moxa,moxart-watchdog";
> + reg = <0x98500000 0x10>;
> + clocks = <&coreclk>;
> + };
This seems sensible to me. I assume the watchdog is a standalone unit,
and not part of some larger piece of IP?
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> index 362085d..6883aab 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> @@ -382,6 +382,16 @@ config RETU_WATCHDOG
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> module will be called retu_wdt.
>
> +config MOXART_WDT
> + tristate "MOXART watchdog"
> + depends on ARCH_MOXART
> + help
> + Say Y here to include Watchdog timer support for the watchdog
> + existing on the MOXA ART SoC series platforms.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> + module will be called moxart_wdt.
> +
> # AVR32 Architecture
>
> config AT32AP700X_WDT
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> index 2f26a0b..7cab53a 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IMX2_WDT) += imx2_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_WATCHDOG) += ux500_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RETU_WATCHDOG) += retu_wdt.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_WDT) += bcm2835_wdt.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MOXART_WDT) += moxart_wdt.o
>
> # AVR32 Architecture
> obj-$(CONFIG_AT32AP700X_WDT) += at32ap700x_wdt.o
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..48dc334
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/moxart_wdt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> +/*
> + * MOXA ART SoCs watchdog driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Jonas Jensen
> + *
> + * Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/watchdog.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> +
> +#define REG_COUNT 0x4
> +#define REG_MODE 0x8
> +#define REG_ENABLE 0xC
> +
> +struct moxart_wdt_dev {
> + struct watchdog_device dev;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + unsigned int clock_frequency;
> +};
> +
> +static int heartbeat;
> +
> +static int moxart_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
> +{
> + struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev);
> +
> + writel(0, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int moxart_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
> +{
> + struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev);
> +
> + writel(moxart_wdt->clock_frequency * wdt_dev->timeout,
> + moxart_wdt->base + REG_COUNT);
> + writel(0x5ab9, moxart_wdt->base + REG_MODE);
> + writel(0x03, moxart_wdt->base + REG_ENABLE);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int moxart_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev,
> + unsigned int timeout)
> +{
> + wdt_dev->timeout = timeout;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct watchdog_info moxart_wdt_info = {
> + .identity = "moxart-wdt",
> + .options = WDIOF_SETTIMEOUT | WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING |
> + WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct watchdog_ops moxart_wdt_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .start = moxart_wdt_start,
> + .stop = moxart_wdt_stop,
> + .set_timeout = moxart_wdt_set_timeout,
> +};
> +
> +static int moxart_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct moxart_wdt_dev *moxart_wdt;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + int err;
> + unsigned int max_timeout;
> + bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
> +
> + moxart_wdt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*moxart_wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!moxart_wdt)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, moxart_wdt);
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + moxart_wdt->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(moxart_wdt->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(moxart_wdt->base);
> +
> + clk = of_clk_get(node, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + pr_err("%s: of_clk_get failed\n", __func__);
> + return PTR_ERR(clk);
> + }
> +
> + moxart_wdt->clock_frequency = clk_get_rate(clk);
> + if (moxart_wdt->clock_frequency == 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: incorrect clock frequency\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + max_timeout = UINT_MAX / moxart_wdt->clock_frequency;
> +
> + moxart_wdt->dev.info = &moxart_wdt_info;
> + moxart_wdt->dev.ops = &moxart_wdt_ops;
> + moxart_wdt->dev.timeout = max_timeout;
> + moxart_wdt->dev.min_timeout = 1;
> + moxart_wdt->dev.max_timeout = max_timeout;
> + moxart_wdt->dev.parent = dev;
> +
> + watchdog_init_timeout(&moxart_wdt->dev, heartbeat, dev);
> + watchdog_set_nowayout(&moxart_wdt->dev, nowayout);
> +
> + watchdog_set_drvdata(&moxart_wdt->dev, moxart_wdt);
> +
> + err = watchdog_register_device(&moxart_wdt->dev);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + return err;
This is a probe path. Is the use of unlikely() really appropriate here?
I suspect it doesn't make any appreciable difference, and should go.
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Watchdog enabled (heartbeat=%d sec, nowayout=%d)\n",
> + moxart_wdt->dev.timeout, nowayout);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 12:29 [PATCH] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-11 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-16 13:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-18 23:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-19 10:23 ` [PATCH v4] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-20 16:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-21 7:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-29 10:20 ` [PATCH v5] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-29 11:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-29 11:41 ` [PATCH v6] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-29 11:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-29 12:33 ` [PATCH v7] " Jonas Jensen
2013-07-29 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-02 11:41 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2013-08-02 14:55 ` Jonas Jensen
2013-08-02 16:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-05 10:12 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-02 14:40 ` [PATCH v8] " Jonas Jensen
2013-08-02 23:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-26 15:18 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130802114159.GK2884@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®