From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754900Ab3HLUnx (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:43:53 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:46549 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752718Ab3HLUnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:43:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:43:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz Message-ID: <20130812204328.GG6427@sirena.org.uk> References: <1376069102-15658-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <20130812163324.GB3636@lee--X1> <20130812170504.GC6427@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ra+QPBLzfvE2u76S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Many pages make a thick book. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: tps65010: Use power efficient workqueue for power polling X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Ra+QPBLzfvE2u76S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:57:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Right, I know checkpatch.pl will complain, but one must exercise some > common sense in situations such at these. To bring down a single zero for > the sake of the (in my opinion, slightly out of date) 80 char rule seems a > little rigid. >=20 > If you feel strongly enough I'll keep your patch in tact however. Please do. Lots of people do continue to use 80 column editors and mail clients and as you say the tooling complains. It's one thing if it's hard to find a place to break the line but that's really not the case here. --Ra+QPBLzfvE2u76S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSCUjtAAoJELSic+t+oim9rp0P/1yLQCeSF7WCo+vTMfHR17RX 1FB7cT5cXf2YxKUZQPQ/UYmzmLTG8/gAeMcug0GZ1bWDp9iYJVqOt2BntyBdk3WX G+Rq9qWWbmj29ndu9dKOa8AVTxuqVgCRva4ILPZrNt/8ZZu2swLNlPRvMCxR6j9A yFughQs0RKrtzuqGe2/CbZIVEn9pWJjQ8CA0s80R2MslRGO5RAiVIzPcALUkoVj7 M5zK+lqyvwYZ7sCg1JbdLS0vWpNlqj317M0LWqKOaW/gyJPxClyD/5hYGMUMfkjE t61uEIkf0mC0YbTucuGcxMs/bFUrw475zD8fFXJG6HEJKjeR3bI9rRxCuKp2T7Do dPH5l/7uw9WMQlmuq+d8xWVjzCovmNEnHz67Pi2GiYDRZntFHnisnQUKXF1LL9yU hLkOPaY+jizs4mfleqVO8XzfpMATZ1zbDBv5qDAmjcXLzcfU5RrMdjEKSV7lirft Lr5wVERVgC8RJPZne6GlrdTCifbpkGiQfTLf27rOvUoFwYvJCScZUZpcMr1iXfz/ lv1CIqqnxl3WTwoIxiVk27PNVnUhRbS8wbm6ard/dMbm6hSjJzFfFN5sDQQ4UELd MtWAd3HmjyxxhF7XSo3YNKpeoBQ8716FW+i+CHPD0giIgvcl09EqR5zWApVMPJby bWevZJ+0F0dGOjBF5KUb =f7zq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ra+QPBLzfvE2u76S--