From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751604Ab3HSXLJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:11:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55406 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264Ab3HSXLH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:11:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:11:06 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, shuahkhan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ 00/45] 3.10.8-stable review Message-ID: <20130819231106.GB5685@kroah.com> References: <20130818203620.996166594@linuxfoundation.org> <5212A0A8.6070807@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5212A0A8.6070807@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:48:08PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 08/18/2013 02:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.8 release. > >There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Tue Aug 20 20:36:09 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.8-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > 3.10.8-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.10.7. > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > each of this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h