From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756836Ab3HZPbk (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:31:40 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:26221 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756568Ab3HZPbi (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:31:38 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aqMw+FlV c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=K5CnSjgaiocA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=HYTzF2Oq1SkA:10 a=NufY4J3AAAAA:8 a=Gn0JQkc8dqoJdQ6f60gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=re9sYKne76oA:10 a=yYVWLxSIFJnIvuox:21 a=UFOp9KPpXgtf3s3Y:21 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:31:34 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Tejun Heo , akpm@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [guv 04/16] core: Convert __get_cpu_var uses Message-ID: <20130826113134.5306379d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <00000140bb35f38a-99d5d8ab-6672-42e8-9e91-55cb231c693d-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <20130823190135.726207430@linux.com> <00000140ac8e2bdd-f0151a00-88ca-4d0b-adbc-007c514b6856-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130826141849.GA6276@home.goodmis.org> <00000140bb35f38a-99d5d8ab-6672-42e8-9e91-55cb231c693d-000000@email.amazonses.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:20:09 +0000 Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > As Tejun said, each commit needs its own change log. Never expect a > > change lgo from another commit to be read for changes in this commit. > > I can copy the intro into each of the patches? That probably would be fine. > > > > This patch needs to be broken up per subsystem. Or are you just looking > > for acks from all the maintainers here and you'll pull it in. If that's > > the case, you should have Cc'd each of the maintainers of the files that > > this touches. > > I did a breakout by arch, then core and drivers. How fine grained do you > want them? This touches a significant portion of the kernel source. > There could be quite a number of maintainers involved. If you plan on sending the patch, then just get an ack for each of the maintainers that this code touches. At least Cc them. Yeah, there are a significant number of maintainers but not that many that it will cause the email to be bounced from LKML for too many Cc's. An Acked-by from David Miller will cover all of net/ subsystem. Maybe make that a separate patch? I can do the tracing patches. Thomas Gleixner can ack all the timing changes. Peter Zijlstra and Ingo Molnar can do the rest of the kernel/ changes. I assume that Andrew Morton can take care of the mm/ changes and perhaps even the radix tree changes. -- Steve