From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
Jim Hull <jim.hull@hp.com>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] partitions/efi: detect hybrid mbrs
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:33:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130902103319.GA1365@x2.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376617039.2389.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:37:19PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:59:42 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:21:08 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This patchset teaches the kernel about hybrid master boot records (MBRs), one of
> > > > > the most common issues with GUID partition tables, as a workaround to layout
> > > > > disk partitions to be compatible with both EFI and legacy MBR based systems.
> > > > > Except for adding more pmbr checks, to better comply with the UEFI/GPT specs, the
> > > > > functionality is left unchanged - we only inform (through debug) the user about
> > > > > the used MBR scheme. While it is true that these restrictions can be bypassed when
> > > > > forcing gpt, this is not the correct or default way of doing things, complicating
> > > > > users furthermore. More details are in the individual patches.
> > > >
> > > > Patches look nice, although I'll cheerily admit to not having a clue
> > > > what they do. What is a "hybrid MBR" anyway?
> > > >
> > > > Someone's editor seems to replace tabs with spaces so the patches
> > > > generate quite a checkpatch storm. Please use checkpatch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Andrew, any chance of getting this in for 3.12?
> >
> > gee, I didn't review the patches because I simply have no useful
> > knowledge in the area. I can check the whitespace and code comments,
> > but that has the downside of creating the false impression that someone
> > actually reviewed the code :(
> >
> > I'm struggling to think who might be better situated. Matt Fleming or
> > Matt Domsch, maybe?
> >
>
> Cc'ing Matt Fleming.
>
> Karel, I believe you took a look at these, any thoughts?
Reviewed-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 5:21 Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] partitions/efi: use lba-aware partition records Davidlohr Bueso
2013-09-02 10:10 ` Karel Zak
2013-09-03 5:01 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] partitions/efi: check pmbr record's starting lba Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] partitions/efi: do not require gpt partition to begin at sector 1 Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] partitions/efi: detect hybrid MBRs Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] partitions/efi: account for pmbr size in lba Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] partitions/efi: compare first and last usable LBAs Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] partitions/efi: delete annoying emacs style comments Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 5:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] partitions/efi: some style cleanups Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-06 21:16 ` [PATCH 0/8] partitions/efi: detect hybrid mbrs Andrew Morton
2013-08-06 22:39 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-15 16:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-15 19:29 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-16 1:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-09-02 10:33 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2013-09-03 12:33 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130902103319.GA1365@x2.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=jim.hull@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®