From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761335Ab3ICVP0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:15:26 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:4259 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760699Ab3ICVPY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:15:24 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ddwCLAre c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=6vL9NhcTi7YA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=Lu4-lkDicUYA:10 a=to-NsOc-1iq-6Jp2KtQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:15:16 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , "Paul E. McKenney" , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/18 v2] ftrace: Add hash list to save RCU unsafe functions Message-ID: <20130903171516.16290c47@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20130831051700.601365837@goodmis.org> References: <20130831051117.884125230@goodmis.org> <20130831051700.601365837@goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:11:18 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > index a6d098c..3750360 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c > @@ -1356,6 +1356,23 @@ ftrace_hash_rec_disable(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int filter_hash); > static void > ftrace_hash_rec_enable(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int filter_hash); > > +static int ftrace_convert_size_to_bits(int size) > +{ > + int bits; > + > + /* > + * Make the hash size about 1/2 the # found > + */ > + for (size /= 2; size; size >>= 1) > + bits++; > + > + /* Don't allocate too much */ > + if (bits > FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS) > + bits = FTRACE_HASH_MAX_BITS; > + > + return bits; > +} > + Just found this bug. Strange that gcc never gave me a warning :-/ -- Steve