mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	paulus@samba.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Clarify error when running "perf lock record"
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 18:35:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130905173538.GB31659@sdfg.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52289536.3070504@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:29:10AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 9/5/13 2:32 AM, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> >If you have the config options enabled in your kernel, you still need to be root
> >to run perf lock. And is kind of misleading when you have that options enabled
> >and the error says that they might not be.
> >
> >So, this patch just adds to the error that it should be run as root. Although we
> >can probably check if it's running as root or not, adding it to the error
> >message is really simple and should be enough.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>
> >---
> >Please keep me in Cc: since I'm not subscribed
> >---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-lock.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> >index 76543a4..f07b318 100644
> >--- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> >+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> >@@ -886,8 +886,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lock_tracepoints); i++) {
> >  		if (!is_valid_tracepoint(lock_tracepoints[i].name)) {
> >  				pr_err("tracepoint %s is not enabled. "
> >-				       "Are CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCK_STAT enabled?\n",
> >-				       lock_tracepoints[i].name);
> >+				       "Are CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_LOCK_STAT enabled "
> >+				       "and running as root?\n", lock_tracepoints[i].name);
> >  				return 1;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >
> 
> you can run perf-lock as non-root with certain settings. It would be

Ohh, I didn't know. Sorry.

> better to discriminate debugfs access errors (insufficient
> privilege). That means improving is_valid_tracepoint and handling
> the errors in perf-lock.

IMHO suggesting to check the privileges should be enough for most cases and is
simpler that checking all that. I mean, for me it's not worth the effort, but
maybe I'm too lazy. Probably it's quite simple too... :-)




Thanks,
Rodrigo

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-05 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05  8:32 Rodrigo Campos
2013-09-05 14:29 ` David Ahern
2013-09-05 17:35   ` Rodrigo Campos [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130905173538.GB31659@sdfg.com.ar \
    --to=rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®