From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kvm: introduce CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:28:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130916082820.GB2101@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130915090838.GW17294@redhat.com>
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:08:38PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:18:49PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Take CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS from arm32, but set the default to 255.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index c76ff74a98f2e..e7e9b523a8f7e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -31,8 +31,9 @@
> > #include <asm/msr-index.h>
> > #include <asm/asm.h>
> >
> > -#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 255
> > -#define KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS 160
> > +#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS CONFIG_KVM_MAX_VCPUS
> > +#define KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS min(160, KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
> > +
> > #define KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS 125
> > /* memory slots that are not exposed to userspace */
> > #define KVM_PRIVATE_MEM_SLOTS 3
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> > index a47a3e54b964b..e9532c33527ee 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
> > @@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ config KVM
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config KVM_MAX_VCPUS
> > + int "Number maximum supported virtual CPUs per VM"
> > + depends on KVM
> > + default 255
> > + help
> > + Static number of max supported virtual CPUs per VM.
> > +
> > + Set to a lower number to save some resources. Set to a higher
> > + number to test scalability.
> > +
> Maximum this can save is around 2K per VM. This is pretty insignificant
> considering overall memory footprint even smallest VM has.
Should I reword this, dropping all 'save resources' verbiage, in order to
avoid sending a message that this option can affect resource consumption?
Or just leave it as it is, because even though it's insignificant, it's
still true and balances out the 'Set to a higher' part.
drew
>
> > config KVM_INTEL
> > tristate "KVM for Intel processors support"
> > depends on KVM
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
>
> --
> Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-14 12:18 Andrew Jones
2013-09-15 9:08 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-16 8:28 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2013-09-16 8:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-16 12:03 ` Andrew Jones
2013-09-16 14:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-16 15:36 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130916082820.GB2101@hawk.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®