From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751458Ab3IPQYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:24:36 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:60880 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750948Ab3IPQYe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:24:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:24:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: Wolfram Sang , Linus Walleij , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Wang Shilong Message-ID: <20130916162428.GE29403@sirena.org.uk> References: <1379094851-26385-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20130916091956.GF3999@lee--X1> <20130916104009.GA29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130916135118.GD29403@sirena.org.uk> <20130916152104.GA3909@katana> <20130916153414.GN16984@lee--X1> <20130916160001.GC3909@katana> <20130916160537.GO16984@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LJYYZogMzwQTNNqC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130916160537.GO16984@lee--X1> X-Cookie: Your present plans will be successful. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] mfd: add STw481x driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --LJYYZogMzwQTNNqC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:05:37PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > So in the mean time are you happy with this "dummy" approach? > > No. "dummy" is reserved for a dummy device in case an i2c slave needs > > more than one address. The proper solution would be if > > i2c_sysfs_new_device() could recognize the of_device_ids. > Okay, thanks for clarifying. Or for now to use something like stw481x (even if it's never expected to actually make a difference). --LJYYZogMzwQTNNqC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSNzC5AAoJELSic+t+oim9HRYQAJ16Q1v8fjVDnyNQs480KQN0 HJKAi6qUUQh3JziwFpgAf+YbTsXpbGsky27jwDLvtzjdvFymlvOi2BC1a37MzYSB SHUp3G+Bp2Op5ljSasDukazIswmSNsc5N0GbyHFWism/XjlAZ/k6SsY9/Eni3QVL T3yZkytMOU8EUzO2tSMM/Pz5zei9kd3UPI0IoCtr/+SvbacIOsljG4gZI02YTfsR apa1neZhLA9gi8FObCQmKHFMyQNKiwt/FFn8SHd2BZojp5vqhlwZXlAN1QrcuCMH CtyGd96/ftXC4OXXsWpr6Sh25rdPQhscpN3xwY69QYYCtbujBbC4TI693dinhqGA sXDLafzfOmM41fHv1Adv8YuldCK7h77zrHQCvTWPNQz8wWgkzWU0g4lBe7weWUvt 711YrGlCPikbV/kLyGMNlwZLVT8R0WSBgelUPVX8YS3BydQFGpXYKyRa3tKS882z iMpe/hphW425eN7yyFE+kRfC+27CjG5DwvVL8bYYZPV8MSMKexog6sfgfqu40Yq+ 04t+W0woxm7TkAVWW0vDbOvl9NbvycfF3Rc2SzWoerdrHcqhF/0UNqBEeSSKu7zZ ugLSZKdx8nxoXlInzoUUAEFFSIiPoV54gZpUp3AuUBr1AiINGL5kHkJkdydqELSF 7/fuNmV6dild11cYFr41 =TO9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LJYYZogMzwQTNNqC--