mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, rgb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] audit: avoid soft lockup in audit_log_start()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:28:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917152842.51158606ed46ec67b97b4448@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378829005.12992.30.camel@flatline.rdu.redhat.com>

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:03:25 -0400 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:

> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -1215,9 +1215,10 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > 
> >                          sleep_time = timeout_start + audit_backlog_wait_time -
> >                                          jiffies;
> > -                       if ((long)sleep_time > 0)
> > +                       if ((long)sleep_time > 0) {
> >                                  wait_for_auditd(sleep_time);
> > -                       continue;
> > +                               continue;
> > +                       }
> >                  }
> >                  if (audit_rate_check() && printk_ratelimit())
> >                          printk(KERN_WARNING
> 
> I think this is the right(ish) fix, at least it gets at the real bug.
> 829199197a430dade2519d54f5545c4a094393b8 definitely is the problem.

um, which idiot wrote that?


Thngs are somewhat foggy at present.  I have two patches from
Dan/Chuck:

Subject: audit: fix soft lockups due to loop in audit_log_start() wh,en audit_backlog_limit exceeded
Subject: audit: two efficiency fixes for audit mechanism

and two from Luiz:

Subject: audit: flush_hold_queue(): don't drop queued SKBs
Subject: audit: kaudit_send_skb(): make non-blocking call to netlink_unicast()

and now a protopatch from Konstantin which eparis likes.

So, umm, guys, can you please devote a bit of time to working out what
we should do here?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-17 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-28 22:21 Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-28 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-28 22:54   ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-28 23:08     ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29  0:49       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-08-30 18:23       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 14:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 14:54   ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:19     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-09 15:29       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-09 15:42         ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-10 16:03   ` Eric Paris
2013-09-10 17:45     ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-17 22:28     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-09-17 22:54       ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-09-18  1:57       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18  9:48       ` [PATCH] audit: fix endless wait " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-09-18 13:31         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06       ` [PATCH 0/8] Audit backlog queue fixes related to soft lockup Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 1/8] audit: avoid soft lockup due to audit_log_start() incorrect loop termination Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 2/8] audit: reset audit backlog wait time after error recovery Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 3/8] audit: make use of remaining sleep time from wait_for_auditd Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 4/8] audit: efficiency fix 1: only wake up if queue shorter than backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 5/8] audit: efficiency fix 2: request exclusive wait since all need same resource Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 6/8] audit: add boot option to override default backlog limit Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 7/8] audit: clean up AUDIT_GET/SET local variables and future-proof API Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-19 21:18           ` Steve Grubb
2013-09-20 14:47             ` Eric Paris
2013-09-23 16:38               ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 19:06         ` [PATCH 8/8] audit: add audit_backlog_wait_time configuration option Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:33           ` Eric Paris
2013-09-18 20:49             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-09-18 20:54               ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130917152842.51158606ed46ec67b97b4448@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®