From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/groups.c: consider about NULL for 'group_info' in all related extern functions
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:58:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925005802.GA25777@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5242331B.4010309@asianux.com>
Hello, Chen.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:49:31AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> > Can you please demonstrate such failure? You can tell kernel to
> > execute a given binary instead of init with "init=" param.
>
> OK, I will/should try, today (although I have to spend my additional
> time resource on it. :-( ).
Please note that that's not necessarily "additional" resource that you
spend. It's more of something necessary to justify the changes you're
suggesting. It's true that not all bug fixes / improvements require
explicit demonstration but I'm not very convinced about your analysis
partly because I'm not too familiar with the code path but also
because the code has been stable with years and you seem pretty new to
the area.
> Hmm... in fact, in my opinion, interface (especially content system
> call) need make itself consistency, although at present, it can not
> cause issue.
Sure, it should be consistent but I'm not sure what you're perceiving
as inconsistent is actually inconsistent. Anyways, let's please have
something deomnstratable. We can think more about the interface
niggles afterwards.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 3:01 Chen Gang
2013-08-20 3:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-03 5:23 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-23 15:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-24 3:42 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-24 4:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-24 4:27 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-24 12:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-25 0:49 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-25 0:58 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-09-25 1:06 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-25 1:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-25 1:47 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-25 4:34 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-26 5:58 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-26 6:30 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-26 13:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-27 1:30 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-27 3:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-27 7:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-27 11:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-27 12:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-09-29 2:50 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130925005802.GA25777@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome