From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932106Ab3IZKQM (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 06:16:12 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:43586 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755712Ab3IZKQK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2013 06:16:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:16:05 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jingoo Han Cc: "'Sachin Kamat'" , "'Liam Girdwood'" , "'LKML'" , "'Steve Twiss'" , "'David Dajun Chen'" Message-ID: <20130926101605.GC19304@sirena.org.uk> References: <000701ceba5c$69459b10$3bd0d130$%han@samsung.com> <000b01ceba5c$e35a8140$aa0f83c0$%han@samsung.com> <002b01ceba81$4413aa10$cc3afe30$%han@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002b01ceba81$4413aa10$cc3afe30$%han@samsung.com> X-Cookie: Don't read everything you believe. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 05/18] regulator: fixed: use devm_regulator_register() X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:25:59PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:14 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > > - regulator_unregister(drvdata->dev); > > > kfree(drvdata->desc.supply_name); > > > kfree(drvdata->desc.name); > > Sorry, couldn't go through all your patches yesterday. > > This one looks a bit scary too as some of the driver data is already > > freed before unregistering. > I looked at regulator_unregister(). I am not sure that this is safe. > So, I will remove this patch from next v3 patch series. > Thank you for your comment. :-) Yes, it'd be better to convert the allocations to be managed ones first. --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSRAliAAoJELSic+t+oim9MhcQAIi3U0VuSAFuEsG6O0wfBEDL mlBeVkBlorduwT6RJ0s8AWp4eYQwdCNwQa/b4Rg+SBMiFfXRZd98rMewGQ3DE1vo 256zzoC0kBc/ZIpAGucgbHzA1sl3F2vs59HHUAAcRG33o9puIC7dehHBjKcd9OPf h0GlzZmOMF4P3yO4BWBrKavXWe6hckJIHnwf6q/+ipFUGhhKIOifawQfaziqHm+E x93ES9xTy1vGrX5L2pRO6hDW3mRRxdA6AECbKhH99pgeuaRsyM+OyvNLmHAeferz 74JUfCNFjgcks7g16ZV4Cu8or7fc/MIs6n67/SwaEquDDapz2Vbd5dDrO08j+u13 5BR6LQPXZCGPO1bdFdob4K1Be99YSBQbN+tV0qCsBK1jZD9xRu7JZtRCyb/f/y2w Kcp1kmTTmcRJ6OoKVkJ8preI8XWyycpcBkmz/x089l7iRZScLT0rp2mckiXvGlyF gj/umoPq6hwCCLED0XrDTlAh+QDt+11RP3Q8FEQgknooRCz0NVNik8KNQDGuNAUv ERb0dpibGQUQmZcq0Kdu8uDCqpbnU0mrDrTul5omwY9GZbO2z1iMypTr1qzrUHkd UspqqAVUy7tcgDFzg0ii0t7f7/2Bb/tbxloL593O2AuG/wumDv2DDRKpw8XIvoFB +jjwkkPoA/nvpjUNdrNa =m0VQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2--