From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754167Ab3I0QM0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:12:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:33968 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754031Ab3I0QMU (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:12:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:12:14 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Mark Brown , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Cameron , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (adt7310) Use spi_w8r16be() instead spi_w8r16() Message-ID: <20130927161214.GA10392@roeck-us.net> References: <1380292469-17347-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <1380292469-17347-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1380292469-17347-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 04:34:28PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Using spi_w8r16be() instead of spi_w8r16() in this driver makes a code a bit > shorter and cleaner. > > Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Would this patch go through the SPI tree ? Thanks, Guenter