From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755175Ab3I3DNa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:13:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57918 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754147Ab3I3DN1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:13:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 05:13:06 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Namhyung Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Ashford , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Separate lbfd check out of NO_DEMANGLE condition Message-ID: <20130930031306.GB993@krava.redhat.com> References: <1380221754-29865-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1380292332-6518-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1380437526.1727.10.camel@leonhard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1380437526.1727.10.camel@leonhard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 03:52:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > 2013-09-27 (금), 16:32 +0200, Jiri Olsa: > > We fail build with NO_DEMANGLE with missing -lbfd externals error. > > The reason is that we now use bfd code in srcline object: > > perf tools: Implement addr2line directly using libbfd > > > > So we need to check/add -lbfd always now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > > Cc: Corey Ashford > > Cc: Ingo Molnar > > Cc: Namhyung Kim > > Cc: Paul Mackerras > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Cc: David Ahern > > --- > > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 17 ++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile > > index 8b49a00..40a41c6 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile > > @@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ else > > endif > > endif > > > > +FLAGS_BFD=$(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -DPACKAGE='perf' -lbfd > > +has_bfd := $(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_BFD),$(FLAGS_BFD),libbfd) > > +ifeq ($(has_bfd),y) > > + EXTLIBS += -lbfd > > + CFLAGS += -DLIBBFD_SUPPORT > > +endif > > + > > ifdef NO_DEMANGLE > > CFLAGS += -DNO_DEMANGLE > > else > > @@ -367,11 +374,7 @@ else > > EXTLIBS += -liberty > > CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE > > else > > - FLAGS_BFD=$(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -DPACKAGE='perf' -lbfd > > - has_bfd := $(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_BFD),$(FLAGS_BFD),libbfd) > > - ifeq ($(has_bfd),y) > > - EXTLIBS += -lbfd > > - else > > + ifneq ($(has_bfd),y) > > FLAGS_BFD_IBERTY=$(FLAGS_BFD) -liberty > > has_bfd_iberty := $(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_BFD),$(FLAGS_BFD_IBERTY),liberty) > > ifeq ($(has_bfd_iberty),y) > > @@ -397,10 +400,6 @@ else > > endif > > endif > > > > -ifndef ($(filter -lbfd,$(EXTLIBS)),) > > - CFLAGS += -DLIBBFD_SUPPORT > > -endif > > - > > ifndef NO_STRLCPY > > ifeq ($(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_STRLCPY),,-DHAVE_STRLCPY),y) > > CFLAGS += -DHAVE_STRLCPY > > Is it enough to check on -lbfd only? I guess libbfd can have additional > dependencies to libiberty and libz. If so, this patch can fail to set > -DLIBBFD_SUPPORT, right? hum, you're right.. so it's 2 bugs fixed by removing that code ;-) jirka