From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754074Ab3I3IPr (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:15:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21208 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753880Ab3I3IPn (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:15:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:15:11 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Eduardo Habkost , LKML , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Gleb Natapov , Paolo Bonzini , Andre Przywara , Joerg Roedel , X86 ML , KVM , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Jiri Denemark Subject: Re: qemu, numa: non-contiguous cpusets Message-ID: <20130930081511.GB23756@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <20130929151044.GB5426@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130929151044.GB5426@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Btw, > > while I got your attention, on a not-really related topic: how do we > feel about adding support for specifying a non-contiguous set of cpus > for a numa node in qemu with the -numa option? I.e., like this, for > example: > > x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 8 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0\;2\;4-5 -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1\;3\;6-7 > > The ';' needs to be escaped from the shell but I'm open for better > suggestions. Use a ':' instead. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|