mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rcusync: introduce struct rcu_sync_ops
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:13:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008091339.GN3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131005171746.GA17664@redhat.com>

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 07:17:46PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> To me the annoying part is that this patch exports rcu_sync_ops*.
> We can add "enum rcu_sync_type rcu_sync_struct->gp_type" instead,
> see the patch below. But then the next "add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
> checks" needs to uninline rcu_sync_is_idle() for CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.
> 
> Or do you still think we should do something else?

> @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
>  	BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
>  
>  	if (need_sync) {
> -		rss->sync();
> +		gp_ops[rss->gp_type].sync();
>  		rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
>  		wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
>  	} else if (need_wait) {
> @@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>  		 * to catch a later GP.
>  		 */
>  		rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> -		rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +		gp_ops[rss->gp_type].call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now
> @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
>  	if (!--rss->gp_count) {
>  		if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
>  			rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> -			rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +			gp_ops[rss->gp_type].call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
>  		} else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
>  			rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
>  		}
> 

I think Linus meant to have rcu_sync_{enter,exit} as inlines with a
const enum argument for the gp_type.

That said; yes that will generate better code, but also more code, and
like Steven already argued performance isn't really an issue here since
we're going to potentially sleep for a rather long time.



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-04 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] rcusync: introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:12   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:22     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-04 19:38       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-04 19:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-05 17:21           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-05 17:17         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08  9:13           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-08 15:33             ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 16:34               ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] rcusync: add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] rcusync: introduce rcu_sync_struct->exclusive mode Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 19:56     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 20:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-06 13:22         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-07 10:49           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcusync: make rcu_sync_enter() return "bool" Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-04 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-04 21:28   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-05 17:22   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131008091339.GN3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome