From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:49:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131016084920.GT10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015174747.813545438@linux.com>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:47:28PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> V3->V4:
> - Drop CONFIG_DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS
> - Add support for logging the exact operation that caused the issue.
>
> We define a check function in order to avoid trouble with the
> include files. Then the higher level __this_cpu macros are
> modified to invoke the check before __this_cpu operation
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>
> Index: linux/include/linux/percpu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/percpu.h 2013-10-10 11:30:17.111743444 -0500
> +++ linux/include/linux/percpu.h 2013-10-10 10:30:26.817316787 -0500
> @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ extern phys_addr_t per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(v
>
> extern void __bad_size_call_parameter(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
> +extern void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op);
> +#else
> +static inline void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op) { }
> +#endif
> +
> #define __pcpu_size_call_return(stem, variable) \
> ({ typeof(variable) pscr_ret__; \
> __verify_pcpu_ptr(&(variable)); \
> @@ -538,7 +544,8 @@ do { \
> # ifndef __this_cpu_read_8
> # define __this_cpu_read_8(pcp) (*__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)))
> # endif
> -# define __this_cpu_read(pcp) __pcpu_size_call_return(__this_cpu_read_, (pcp))
> +# define __this_cpu_read(pcp) \
> + (__this_cpu_preempt_check("read"),__pcpu_size_call_return(__this_cpu_read_, (pcp)))
> #endif
>
So I didn't understand what was wrong with:
#define __this_cpu_read(pcp) \
(__this_cpu_preempt_check("read"), raw_this_cpu_read(pcp))
And idem for all others. This is 1) shorter to write; and 2) makes it
blindingly obvious that the implementations are actually the same.
> Index: linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/lib/smp_processor_id.c 2013-10-10 11:30:17.111743444 -0500
> +++ linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c 2013-10-10 10:32:16.046357108 -0500
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
>
> -notrace unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void)
> +notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(char *what)
> {
> unsigned long preempt_count = preempt_count();
> int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ notrace unsigned int debug_smp_processor
> if (!printk_ratelimit())
> goto out_enable;
>
> - printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [%08x] "
> - "code: %s/%d\n",
> - preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s in preemptible [%08x] code: %s/%d\n",
> + what, preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);
> +
Like already said; NAK until that "BUG" remains.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 17:47 [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4b Christoph Lameter
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] net: ip4_datagram_connect: Use correct form of statistics update Christoph Lameter
2013-10-15 18:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-16 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-16 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 9:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-16 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-16 14:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 14:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: Use raw_cpu ops for determining current NUMA node Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 14:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] Use raw_cpu_write for initialization of per cpu refcount Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] net: __this_cpu_inc in route.c Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-16 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 15:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-15 17:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-16 15:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-16 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-16 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-16 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-17 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] <20131011175518.634285474@linux.com>
2013-10-11 17:54 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131016084920.GT10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome