From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754785Ab3JPOex (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:34:53 -0400 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:11141 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751016Ab3JPOev (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:34:51 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Wed, 16 Oct 2013 07:34:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:34:48 +0300 From: Peter De Schrijver To: Stephen Warren CC: Prashant Gaikwad , Mike Turquette , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Hiroshi Doyu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/19] clk: tegra: add common infra for DT clocks Message-ID: <20131016143448.GK5643@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1381848794-11761-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1381848794-11761-9-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <525D9117.9050009@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525D9117.9050009@wwwdotorg.org> X-NVConfidentiality: public User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/15/2013 08:52 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > Introduce a common infrastructure for sharing clock initialization between > > SoCs. > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c > > > +struct clk ** __init tegra_lookup_dt_id(int clk_id, > > + struct tegra_clk *tegra_clk) > > +{ > > + if (tegra_clk[clk_id].present) > > + return &clks[tegra_clk[clk_id].dt_id]; > > + else > > + return NULL; > > Does this need range-checking? Or do we assume that since this is an > internal function, "clk_id" will never be out-of-range? That was my assumption indeed. I could add a range check if you think that's useful. Cheers, Peter.