From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: tegra: Add support for PLLSS
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:57:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131017075743.GQ5643@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525ECB08.4020201@wwwdotorg.org>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:21:12PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 01:48 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 10/15/2013 09:14 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >>> Tegra124 introduces a new PLL type, PLLSS. Add support for it.
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
> >>
> >>
> >>> +static int clk_pllss_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> >>
> >> This function seems pretty generic. Is it possible to share a bit more
> >> code with any of the other pllXXX_set_rate() functions?
> >>
> >>> +struct clk *tegra_clk_register_pllss(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> >>> + void __iomem *clk_base, unsigned long flags,
> >>> + struct tegra_clk_pll_params *pll_params,
> >>> + spinlock_t *lock)
> >>
> >>> + val = pll_readl_base(pll);
> >>> + if (val & PLLSS_REF_SRC_SEL_MASK) {
> >>> + WARN(1, "Unknown parent selected for %s: %d\n", name,
> >>> + (val & PLLSS_REF_SRC_SEL_MASK) >>
> >>> + PLLSS_REF_SRC_SEL_SHIFT);
> >>> + kfree(pll);
> >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> If there's a field in HW that muxes the clock input between n clocks,
> >> why does this function assume there's a single parent for this PLL, by
> >> taking a "const char *parent_name" parameter?
> >>
> >> What happens if the bootloader changed this field in HW; is the kernel
> >> simply not able to boot?
> >>
> >
> > This logic comes from downstream. I guess it means we're running in an
> > unvalidated configuration. Do you think we should expose all parents
> > anyway? Even if not all configurations have been validated?
> > (which is quite likely)
>
> If we only support one particular parent, why not force the register
> field to the desired value, rather than failing?
Sounds reasonable indeed. I will do that in the next version.
Cheers,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-17 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 15:14 [PATCH v2 0/7] Tegra124 clock support Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: tegra: Add support for PLLSS Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 20:20 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-16 7:48 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-16 17:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-17 7:57 ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] clk: tegra: Add periph regs bank X Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] clk: tegra124: Add common clk IDs to clk-id.h Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: tegra124: Add new peripheral clocks Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 20:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] clk: tegra124: Add support for Tegra124 clocks Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 20:29 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-16 16:13 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: tegra124: add wait_for_reset and disable_clock for tegra_cpu_car_ops Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] clk: tegra124: add suspend/resume function " Peter De Schrijver
2013-10-15 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Tegra124 clock support Olof Johansson
2013-10-15 20:31 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131017075743.GQ5643@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
--to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®