From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762711Ab3JQU5A (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:57:00 -0400 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:62783 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758245Ab3JQU46 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:56:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:56:56 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Bob Copeland Cc: Arend van Spriel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: trace-cmd problem with FC19 Message-ID: <20131017165656.54b8b985@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <525FD328.1040204@broadcom.com> <20131017144116.044f3aaf@gandalf.local.home> <52604373.5010907@broadcom.com> <20131017162029.002485b1@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:43:08 -0400 Bob Copeland wrote: > [sorry, resent for the archives, I failed email] > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:07:15 +0200 > > "Arend van Spriel" wrote: > > > > > >> > Does recording other traces work? Or is it only spicific to this module? > >> > >> It seems a generic issue: > >> > >> $ sudo trace-cmd record -e ext4:* ls > >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/ext4/*/filter > >> systemd-private-6pVB5L systemd-private-KdpFqS trace.dat.cpu0 trace.dat.cpu2 > >> systemd-private-9hedRD trace.dat trace.dat.cpu1 trace.dat.cpu3 > >> trace-cmd: Interrupted system call > >> recorder error in splice input > >> trace-cmd: Interrupted system call > >> recorder error in splice input > >> trace-cmd: Interrupted system call > >> recorder error in splice input > > Perhaps this is an instance of this bug? > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/31/426 > > tl;dr try with latest trace-cmd? I hit the above myself. > Hmm, are you sure? You may want to do both: sudo trace-cmd -v which trace-cmd to see which version it is. -- Steve