From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sebastien.dugue@bull.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:11:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018201133.GD4019@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382116835.3284.23.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:20:35AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 12:50 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
>
> > for(i=0;i<100000;i++) {
> > sum = csum_partial(buf+offset, PAGE_SIZE, sum);
> > offset = (offset < BUFSIZ-PAGE_SIZE) ? offset+PAGE_SIZE : 0;
> > }
>
> Please replace this by random accesses, and use the more standard 1500
> length.
>
> offset = prandom_u32() % (BUFSIZ - 1500);
> offset &= ~1U;
>
> sum = csum_partial(buf + offset, 1500, sum);
>
> You are basically doing sequential accesses, so prefetch should
> be automatically done by cpu itself.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
Sure, you got it! Results below. However, they continue to bear out that
parallel execution beats prefetch only execution, and both is better than either
one.
base results:
53156647
59670931
62839770
44842780
39297190
44905905
53300688
53287805
39436951
43021730
AVG=493 ns
prefetch-only results:
40337434
51986404
43509199
53128857
52973171
53520649
53536338
50325466
44864664
47908398
AVG=492 ns
parallel-only results:
52157183
44496511
36180011
38298368
36258099
43263531
45365519
54116344
62529241
63118224
AVG = 475 ns
both prefetch and parallel:
44317078
44526464
45761272
44477906
34868814
44637904
49478309
49718417
58681403
58304972
AVG = 474 ns
Heres the code I was using
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
#include <net/rtnetlink.h>
#include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
static char *buf;
#define BUFSIZ_ORDER 4
#define BUFSIZ ((2 << BUFSIZ_ORDER) * (1024*1024*2))
static int __init csum_init_module(void)
{
int i;
__wsum sum = 0;
struct timespec start, end;
u64 time;
struct page *page;
u32 offset = 0;
page = alloc_pages((GFP_TRANSHUGE & ~__GFP_MOVABLE), BUFSIZ_ORDER);
if (!page) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "NO MEMORY FOR ALLOCATION");
return -ENOMEM;
}
buf = page_address(page);
printk(KERN_CRIT "INITALIZING BUFFER\n");
preempt_disable();
printk(KERN_CRIT "STARTING ITERATIONS\n");
getnstimeofday(&start);
for(i=0;i<100000;i++) {
sum = csum_partial(buf+offset, 1500, sum);
offset = prandom_u32() % (BUFSIZ - 1500);
offset &= ~1U;
}
getnstimeofday(&end);
preempt_enable();
if ((unsigned long)start.tv_nsec > (unsigned long)end.tv_nsec)
time = (ULONG_MAX - (unsigned long)end.tv_nsec) + (unsigned long)start.tv_nsec;
else
time = (unsigned long)end.tv_nsec - (unsigned long)start.tv_nsec;
printk(KERN_CRIT "COMPLETED 100000 iterations of csum in %llu nanosec\n", time);
__free_pages(page, BUFSIZ_ORDER);
return 0;
}
static void __exit csum_cleanup_module(void)
{
return;
}
module_init(csum_init_module);
module_exit(csum_cleanup_module);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-11 16:51 Neil Horman
2013-10-12 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-13 12:53 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-14 20:28 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-14 21:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-14 22:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-14 22:37 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-14 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-14 22:49 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-15 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-15 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 16:21 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-16 0:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-16 6:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-16 16:55 ` Joe Perches
2013-10-17 0:34 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-17 1:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-18 16:50 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-18 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-18 20:11 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2013-10-18 21:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-20 21:29 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-21 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 17:46 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-21 19:21 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-21 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 20:19 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-26 12:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-26 13:58 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-27 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-27 17:05 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-17 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-17 18:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-17 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-18 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 16:01 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-28 16:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 17:49 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-28 16:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 16:49 ` David Ahern
2013-10-28 17:46 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-28 18:29 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-29 11:20 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-29 11:49 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 12:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-29 13:07 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-29 13:20 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 14:17 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-29 20:26 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-31 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-31 14:33 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-01 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-01 14:06 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-29 14:12 ` David Ahern
2013-10-15 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 13:14 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-12 22:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-13 12:53 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-18 16:42 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-18 17:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-25 13:06 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-14 4:38 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-14 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-14 21:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-15 13:17 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-14 20:25 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-15 7:12 ` Sébastien Dugué
2013-10-15 13:33 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-15 13:56 ` Sébastien Dugué
2013-10-15 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-15 14:15 ` Sébastien Dugué
2013-10-15 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-15 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-15 16:02 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-16 0:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-06 15:23 ` x86: Enhance perf checksum profiling and x86 implementation Neil Horman
2013-11-06 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Add csum benchmark tests to perf Neil Horman
2013-11-06 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: add prefetching to do_csum Neil Horman
2013-11-06 15:34 ` Dave Jones
2013-11-06 15:54 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-06 17:19 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-06 18:11 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-06 20:02 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-06 20:07 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 16:25 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-08 16:51 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 19:07 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-08 19:17 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 20:08 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-08 19:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-08 19:01 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-08 19:33 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 20:14 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-08 20:29 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-11 19:40 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-11 21:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-06 18:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-06 18:59 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-06 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2013-11-07 21:23 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-18 15:46 [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's Doug Ledford
2013-10-18 17:42 Doug Ledford
2013-10-19 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-21 17:54 ` Doug Ledford
2013-10-26 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 17:02 ` Doug Ledford
2013-10-29 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-30 5:25 Doug Ledford
2013-10-30 10:27 ` David Laight
2013-10-30 11:02 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-30 12:18 ` David Laight
2013-10-30 13:22 ` Doug Ledford
2013-10-30 13:35 ` Doug Ledford
2013-10-30 14:04 ` David Laight
2013-10-30 14:52 ` Neil Horman
2013-10-31 18:30 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-01 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-01 15:42 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-11-01 16:08 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-01 16:16 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-11-01 16:18 ` David Laight
2013-11-01 17:37 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-01 19:45 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-01 19:58 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-01 20:26 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-02 2:07 ` Neil Horman
2013-11-04 9:47 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131018201133.GD4019@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®