Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.101-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:39:51PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 01:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > NOTE:
> >    This is the LAST 3.0.x stable kernel release that I will be doing.
> >    After this release, 3.0.x is End-Of-Life, please move to the 3.10.x,
> >    or if you must, 3.4.x series.  For more information about longterm
> >    stable releases and how long they will be maintained, please see
> >    https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.101 release.
> > There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 20 19:50:26 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.101-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > -------------
> 
> Patch applied cleanly 	 yes
> Compile testing          passed
> Boot testing 	         passed
> dmesg regression testing passed
> Cross-compile testing    passed
> 
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for 
> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions
> in warn.

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h