mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] timer: Change idle/iowait accounting semantics
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:34:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131020073456.GA2729@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382195841-6558-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Hi,

just wanted to report that this capricious open-coded (ok, lone-coded :)
converter:

+static inline ktime_t us_to_ktime(u64 us)
+{
+	static const ktime_t ktime_zero = { .tv64 = 0 };
+
+	return ktime_add_us(ktime_zero, us);
+}

triggered a virtual red flag in my processing.

We obviously seem to be compensating for a domain mismatch here:

+	iowait = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+
+	if (ktime_compare(idle, us_to_ktime(iowait)) > 0)
+		idle = ktime_sub_us(idle, iowait);
+

And sure enough:
get_cpu_iowait_time_us() does a final to-us conversion
only right before result is returned,
and it's located right within the same build unit (tick-sched.c).
(and then we go ahead and do a from-us round trip :-P)

So, in case we want to standardize on ktime_t domain
for these parts of purely *in-kernel* time handling,
how about adding a _unit-local_ helper for providing a ktime-only result
and convert get_cpu_iowait_time_us() into a simple to-us *external user code*
one-line wrapper for it?
(and include updates to all other places which would benefit from this change)

And preferably launch such patch as a preparatory patch for this
subsequent 3/5 patch, within the series?

Unless I missed some other restrictions which cause us to need to cling
to that manual from-us conversion, for now or forever...

Andreas Mohr

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-20  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-19 15:17 [RFC PATCH 0/5] nohz: Fix racy sleeptime stats v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] nohz: Convert a few places to use local per cpu accesses Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] nohz: Only update sleeptime stats locally Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] timer: Change idle/iowait accounting semantics Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-20  7:34   ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2013-11-04 16:22     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: Refactor iowait accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 15:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-19 16:02     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-19 16:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-19 16:20         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-20 11:10   ` Andreas Mohr
2013-11-04 17:34     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-11-04 18:38       ` Andreas Mohr
2013-10-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] nohz: Synchronize sleep time stats with seqlock Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131020073456.GA2729@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
    --to=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=fernando_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®