From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com,
zheng.z.yan@intel.com, bp@alien8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] perf,x86: add RAPL hrtimer support
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:44:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131025174448.GD7024@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382533085-7166-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:05PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> The RAPL PMU counters do not interrupt on overflow.
> Therefore, the kernel needs to poll the counters
> to avoid missing an overflow. This patch adds
> the hrtimer code to do this.
>
> The timer internval is calculated at boot time
> based on the power unit used by the HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
> index 3d71d39..ed0566a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ static struct kobj_attribute format_attr_##_var = \
>
> struct rapl_pmu {
> spinlock_t lock;
> - atomic_t refcnt;
> int hw_unit; /* 1/2^hw_unit Joule */
> - int phys_id;
> - int n_active; /* number of active events */
> + struct hrtimer hrtimer;
> struct list_head active_list;
> + ktime_t timer_interval; /* in ktime_t unit */
> + int n_active; /* number of active events */
> + int phys_id;
> + atomic_t refcnt;
> };
>
> static struct pmu rapl_pmu_class;
> @@ -161,6 +163,47 @@ static u64 rapl_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> return new_raw_count;
> }
>
> +static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&pmu->hrtimer,
> + pmu->timer_interval, 0,
> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void rapl_stop_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
> +}
> +
> +static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> +{
> + struct rapl_pmu *pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
> + struct perf_event *event;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!pmu->n_active)
> + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry) {
> + rapl_event_update(event);
> + }
hi,
I dont fully understand the reason for the timer,
I'm probably missing something..
- the timer calls rapl_event_update for all defined events
- but rapl_pmu_event_read calls rapl_event_update any time the
event is read (sys_read)
The rapl_event_update only read msr and updates
event->count|hw,prev_count.
What's the timer purpose then?
thanks for info,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-25 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 12:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf,x86: add Intel RAPL PMU support Stephane Eranian
2013-10-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: add active_entry list head to struct perf_event Stephane Eranian
2013-10-25 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-26 16:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-26 17:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-28 9:58 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf stat: add event unit and scale support Stephane Eranian
2013-10-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf,x86: add Intel RAPL PMU support Stephane Eranian
2013-10-25 11:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-25 11:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-25 11:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-26 17:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-28 10:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-28 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-28 15:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf,x86: add RAPL hrtimer support Stephane Eranian
2013-10-25 17:44 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2013-10-26 17:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-10-26 17:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-28 9:55 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131025174448.GD7024@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome