From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel/kallsyms.c: only show legal kernel symbol
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:09:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030230920.GQ16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ob6aeyg4.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:20:19PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:44:30 +1030
> > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> I don't know... It would be your job, as the person making the change,
> >> to find all the users of kallsyms and prove that.
> >>
> >> This is why it is easier not to include incorrect values in the kernel's
> >> kallsyms in the first place.
> >
> > OK, thanks for your comment, and I figured out one way to do it in
> > scripts/kallsyms.c, could you comment on below patch?
>
> Looks great! Seems like we spent more time arguing than it took you to
> code that up.
>
> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> Russell, this seems logical for you to take along with the changes which
> caused the problem?
The changes are already in mainline since a long time (back in July/August
time). Am I the right person to take stuff for scripts/ ? Isn't that
more kbuild territory?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 3:18 Ming Lei
2013-10-24 1:21 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-24 5:42 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-24 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-24 9:10 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-24 23:08 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-25 1:29 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-25 5:50 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-25 7:01 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-25 11:58 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-26 12:31 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-28 3:14 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-28 5:23 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-28 5:50 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-30 23:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-10-31 3:14 ` Rusty Russell
2013-10-31 4:55 ` Ming Lei
2013-11-01 2:28 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131030230920.GQ16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®