From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
willy@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
airlied@gmail.com, maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com,
walken@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC 0/8] Move locking primitives into kernel/locking/
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:10:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131105105244.666320103@infradead.org> (raw)
Hi all,
During Kernel Summit Dave mentioned that there wasn't a clear maintainer for
locking bits.
To remedy this Ingo suggested gathering all the various locking primitives and
lockdep into a single place: kernel/locking/.
I would further like to propose a MAINTAINERS entry like:
LOCKING
M: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
M: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
M: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
M: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking/core
S: Maintained
F: kernel/locking/
Because for most 'fun' locking discussions we usually end up with at least
those people anyway :-)
Comments?
---
kernel/lglock.c | 89
kernel/lockdep.c | 4257 -----------------------------------
kernel/lockdep_internals.h | 170 -
kernel/lockdep_proc.c | 683 -----
kernel/lockdep_states.h | 9
kernel/mutex-debug.c | 110
kernel/mutex-debug.h | 55
kernel/mutex.c | 960 -------
kernel/mutex.h | 48
kernel/rtmutex-debug.c | 187 -
kernel/rtmutex-debug.h | 33
kernel/rtmutex-tester.c | 420 ---
kernel/rtmutex.c | 1060 --------
kernel/rtmutex.h | 26
kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 126 -
kernel/rwsem.c | 157 -
kernel/semaphore.c | 263 --
kernel/spinlock.c | 399 ---
lib/percpu-rwsem.c | 165 -
lib/rwsem-spinlock.c | 296 --
lib/rwsem.c | 293 --
lib/spinlock_debug.c | 302 --
kernel/locking/Makefile | 25
kernel/locking/lglock.c | 89
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 170 +
kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 683 +++++
kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h | 9
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 110
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.h | 55
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 960 +++++++
kernel/locking/mutex.h | 48
kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 165 +
kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c | 187 +
kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.h | 33
kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c | 420 +++
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 1060 ++++++++
kernel/locking/rtmutex.h | 26
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 126 +
kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 296 ++
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 293 ++
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 157 +
kernel/locking/semaphore.c | 263 ++
kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 399 +++
kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c | 302 ++
kernel/Makefile | 22
kernel/futex.c | 2
lib/Makefile | 4
48 files changed, 10138 insertions(+), 10131 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 12:10 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 1/8] locking: Move mutex " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 20:26 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-05 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 21:24 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-06 5:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-06 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 2/8] locking: Move lockdep " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 3/8] locking: Move spinlock " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 4/8] locking: Move semaphore " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 5/8] locking: Move rtmutex " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 6/8] locking: Move rwsem " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 7/8] locking: Move lglocks " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 12:10 ` [RFC 8/8] locking: Move percpu-rwsem " Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-05 13:18 ` [RFC 0/8] Move locking primitives " Steven Rostedt
2013-11-05 13:21 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-11-05 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-05 13:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-05 14:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-05 19:38 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-06 14:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-08 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-08 23:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131105105244.666320103@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®