From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755429Ab3KEUdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:33:17 -0500 Received: from dkim2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.54]:37317 "EHLO dkim2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754829Ab3KEUdP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:33:15 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1383683594-03d6a54d1810ddd0001-xx1T2L X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: clmason@fusionio.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Olof Johansson , Jens Axboe From: Chris Mason In-Reply-To: CC: Tushar Behera , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , lkml References: <52794823.7080503@kernel.dk> Message-ID: <20131105203308.3802.45122@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: alot/0.3.4 Subject: Re: Boot failure on Arndale with next-20131105 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:33:08 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Boot failure on Arndale with next-20131105 X-Originating-IP: [10.101.1.160] X-Barracuda-Connect: cas2.int.fusionio.com[10.101.1.41] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1383683594 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.101.1.180:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.142084 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Olof Johansson (2013-11-05 15:23:51) > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: [ horrible crashes fixed by removing my patch ] > > Very weird! What file system is being used? > > Most of my failures have happened on regular MMC cards with ext4 > filesystems on them. > > Note that the panic happens during device probe / partition table > scanning, not after mounting the filesystem. > > Giving your patch a go now across the board. I'm very concerned about > the reports of bisectability, build failures and heaps of warnings > though. Did the 0-day builder pick up any of those? :-/ > Hmmm, is bcache in your config? -chris