mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: mwhitehe@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@fedoraproject.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, holt@sgi.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, chaowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make reboot task only run on the appropriate processor
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:20:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131107022015.GA2491@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105202855.GD4598@redhat.com>

On 11/05/13 at 03:28pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Currently system always reboot after below message when execute "kexec -e".
> > 
> > [    0.572119] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors  #   1 OK
> > 
> 
> So is it same problem were we reboot on non-boot cpu and sending INIT
> to boot cpu in second kernel brings down the machine?

I was wrong, they are the same problem. With multiple CPUs, by setting
affinity to execute crash or kexec on CPUn(n!==0), they all reboot after
the same message as below and then reboot through BIOS. It should be the
BSP got a INIT IPI message and make system hang.

[    0.572119] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors  #   1 OK

> 
> I think for x86, it makes sense to reboot on boot cpu.
> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> > In commit 1b3a5d02ee070c8f9943333b9b6370f486601e0f, reboot= handling was
> > moved to kerne/reboot.c. However, the code to migrate current thread to
> > reboot cpu was removed. That cause this incorrect kexec behavior.
> > 
> > Now add that code block back.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Matthew Whitehead <mwhitehe@redhat.com>
> > Reported-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > index 7e920bf..3049de9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > @@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ void native_machine_shutdown(void)
> >  {
> >  	/* Stop the cpus and apics */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +       /* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > +       int reboot_cpu_id = 0;
> > +
> > +       /* See if there has been given a command line override */
> > +       if ((reboot_cpu != -1) && (reboot_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) &&
> > +               cpu_online(reboot_cpu))
> > +               reboot_cpu_id = reboot_cpu;
> > +
> > +       /* Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online */
> > +       if (!cpu_online(reboot_cpu_id))
> > +               reboot_cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> > +
> > +       /* Make certain I only run on the appropriate processor */
> > +       set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(reboot_cpu_id));
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Stop all of the others. Also disable the local irq to
> >  	 * not receive the per-cpu timer interrupt which may trigger
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-07  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05  9:16 Baoquan He
2013-11-05 20:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-05 21:39   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-06  9:48   ` Baoquan He
2013-11-07  2:20   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2013-11-08  1:33 ` Dave Young
2013-11-08 15:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-08 16:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-08 16:24     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 15:29     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 15:39       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-11 15:57         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 16:02           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-10  9:44   ` Baoquan He
2013-11-11  6:52     ` Baoquan He
2013-11-11  6:55   ` WANG Chao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131107022015.GA2491@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davej@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mwhitehe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®