From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: mwhitehe@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@fedoraproject.org,
mingo@redhat.com, holt@sgi.com, hpa@zytor.com,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, chaowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make reboot task only run on the appropriate processor
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:20:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131107022015.GA2491@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105202855.GD4598@redhat.com>
On 11/05/13 at 03:28pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Currently system always reboot after below message when execute "kexec -e".
> >
> > [ 0.572119] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors # 1 OK
> >
>
> So is it same problem were we reboot on non-boot cpu and sending INIT
> to boot cpu in second kernel brings down the machine?
I was wrong, they are the same problem. With multiple CPUs, by setting
affinity to execute crash or kexec on CPUn(n!==0), they all reboot after
the same message as below and then reboot through BIOS. It should be the
BSP got a INIT IPI message and make system hang.
[ 0.572119] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors # 1 OK
>
> I think for x86, it makes sense to reboot on boot cpu.
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
> > In commit 1b3a5d02ee070c8f9943333b9b6370f486601e0f, reboot= handling was
> > moved to kerne/reboot.c. However, the code to migrate current thread to
> > reboot cpu was removed. That cause this incorrect kexec behavior.
> >
> > Now add that code block back.
> >
> > Reported-by: Matthew Whitehead <mwhitehe@redhat.com>
> > Reported-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > index 7e920bf..3049de9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > @@ -551,6 +551,21 @@ void native_machine_shutdown(void)
> > {
> > /* Stop the cpus and apics */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + /* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > + int reboot_cpu_id = 0;
> > +
> > + /* See if there has been given a command line override */
> > + if ((reboot_cpu != -1) && (reboot_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) &&
> > + cpu_online(reboot_cpu))
> > + reboot_cpu_id = reboot_cpu;
> > +
> > + /* Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online */
> > + if (!cpu_online(reboot_cpu_id))
> > + reboot_cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> > +
> > + /* Make certain I only run on the appropriate processor */
> > + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(reboot_cpu_id));
> > +
> > /*
> > * Stop all of the others. Also disable the local irq to
> > * not receive the per-cpu timer interrupt which may trigger
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 9:16 Baoquan He
2013-11-05 20:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-05 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-06 9:48 ` Baoquan He
2013-11-07 2:20 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2013-11-08 1:33 ` Dave Young
2013-11-08 15:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-08 16:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-08 16:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 15:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 15:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-11 15:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-11 16:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-10 9:44 ` Baoquan He
2013-11-11 6:52 ` Baoquan He
2013-11-11 6:55 ` WANG Chao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131107022015.GA2491@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mwhitehe@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®