From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932245Ab3KIABp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:01:45 -0500
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:42564 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757639Ab3KIABl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:01:41 -0500
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:01:23 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Support arch_irq_work_raise() via self IPIs
Message-ID: <20131109000123.GV16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <526DBEAA.4030707@linaro.org> <1382984701-2371-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <878uxcq1m7.fsf@linaro.org> <20131029060058.GD21983@codeaurora.org> <CAOesGMhjC=NDn4YiY4tQ3ZcW_rK9_qOY03CVD1eyVFC74ucdrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOesGMhB2Akf_B2_J3LVdt1bDvcsTE7+8Kq=NvsXmkf3EwGsiw@mail.gmail.com> <527D5D5C.2080409@codeaurora.org> <CAOesGMhyPaMUs3XJshqZ-KYhtWhenttq7qDpF0+4dQ9PvBYVGA@mail.gmail.com> <527D7621.2000105@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <527D7621.2000105@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:39:13PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/08/13 15:35, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah yes. We don't have IPI support on UP kernels but SMP_ON_UP exposes
> >> arch_irq_work_raise(). How about this? We should just skip this function
> >> if we're running on UP.
> > Yep.
> >
> > Tested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> >
> > Send it to Russell's tracker, plz.
> >
> 
> Thanks. 7887/1.

It's probably going to miss Stephen's pull from my tree this evening (if
he even does one) so... that gives me two options: either drop the original
commit or apply this.

I think I'll apply this and put it in place just after the original commit
which caused the breakage.

Thanks.