From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sysfs_bin_mmap lockdep trace.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:10:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113201043.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131113184538.GA7269@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:45:38PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Al, is this one also known ? Also seen on v3.12-7033-g42a2d923cc34
Umm... I've seen something like that reported after sysfs merge went in
(right after 3.12), but I hadn't looked into details.
> -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
[sr_block_ioctl() grabs sr_mutex and does copy_from_user() under it]
> -> #2 (sr_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[sr_block_open() grabs sr_mutex under ->bd_mutex]
> -> #1 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[sysfs_blk_trace_attr_show() grabs ->bd_mutex and is called under
sysfs_open_file ->mutex]
> -> #0 (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}:
[sysfs_open_file ->mutex is grabbed by ->mmap()]
Cute... AFAICS, it came from "sysfs: copy bin mmap support from fs/sysfs/bin.c
to fs/sysfs/file.c". The first impression is that sysfs_bin_mmap() is
checking for battr->mmap too late, but I'm not sure whether we need of->mutex
to stabilize it... Tejun, any comments?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 18:45 Dave Jones
2013-11-13 20:10 ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-11-14 5:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-11-15 1:19 ` Dave Jones
2013-11-17 2:17 ` [PATCH] sysfs: use a separate locking class for open files depending on mmap Tejun Heo
2013-11-17 3:21 ` Dave Jones
2013-11-17 3:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-11-18 4:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-11-20 6:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131113201043.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®