From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@gmail.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mikey@neuling.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Check sched_domain before computing group power.
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114083037.GT21461@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52846863.4060001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:36:27AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> However I was thinking that a better fix would be to reorder the way we call
> update_group_power() and cpu_attach_domain(). Why do we need to do
> update_group_power() of the groups of the sched domains that would probably
> degenerate in cpu_attach_domain()? So it seemed best to move update_group_power()
> to after cpu_attach_domain() so that it saves unnecessary iterations over
> sched domains which could degenerate, and it fixes the issue that you have brought out
> as well. See below for the patch:
So how is publishing the domain tree before we've set these values at
all going to help avoid the divide-by-zero problem?
Also its just terribly bad form to publish something before you're done
with initialization.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 18:05 [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Fix group power_orig computation tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-12 23:21 ` Michael Neuling
2013-11-12 10:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-12 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-12 16:41 ` [PATCH v2] sched: Check sched_domain before computing group power Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-12 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-12 17:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-12 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-13 5:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
[not found] ` <CAM4v1pNMn=5oZDiX3fUp9uPkZTPJgk=vEKEjevzvpwn=PjTzXg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-13 11:23 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-14 6:06 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-11-14 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-11-14 9:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-11-13 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 10:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-14 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-19 19:15 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-19 23:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-21 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 17:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-21 22:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-28 3:02 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-28 7:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-28 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-28 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-12-06 6:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-12-10 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-10 21:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-22 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-23 5:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-23 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-28 2:57 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131114083037.GT21461@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=preeti.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome