From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754100Ab3KNOL7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:11:59 -0500 Received: from order.stressinduktion.org ([87.106.68.36]:42819 "EHLO order.stressinduktion.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753987Ab3KNOLu (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:11:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:11:49 +0100 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa To: Kamala R Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPv6: Blackhole route support partial ? Message-ID: <20131114141149.GC26901@order.stressinduktion.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kamala R , davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20131111203954.GB3043@order.stressinduktion.org> <20131112135412.GF14929@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:50:20PM +0530, Kamala R wrote: > I have one quick question before I send the patch across. I noticed > that "ip -6 route show" shows an error -22 in the output which > signifies -EINVAL associated with blackhole routes. This behaviour is > not consistent with that of "ip route show" that shows no such error > for a blackhole route. Does this qualify a bug that needs fixing ? You mean that we don't show the error for IPv4 routes? Is this a kernel or iproute problem? Greetings, Hannes